I'm genuinely curious if one runs the risk of running afoul of regulations in certain jurisdictions by holding funds on behalf of users. And if so, has anyone thought of an implementation that does not require stacker.news (or similar site) to host funds (not-custodial)?
15 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Oct 2021
Why would you put yourself and with your own consent under jurisdiction of anybody? Only slaves do that. Bitcoiners are sovereign individuals not nocoiner slaves.
Please read this https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/natural-law-and-bitcoin
reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @CypherPoet 15 Oct 2021
With my authority as the Honorable Chief Supreme President Commander of the Universe, I hereby decree that Stacker News requires a money transmitter license for my jurisdiction. Please send 200 BTC immediately in order to comply 😂😂😂
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Oct 2021
I will gladly accept your contract offer, but only if you send me back 400 BTC 😂😂😂
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @bataroot 15 Oct 2021
How did I miss your article about Natural Law!
Great read. Thanks!
reply
15 sats \ 1 reply \ @fiatjaf 15 Oct 2021 freebie
The goal is to never ask these questions, do not ask for permission.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @ThrillerX_ 18 Oct 2021
Yes always this!
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @mf 15 Oct 2021
I'll allow it. I hereby consent everyone to be sovereign
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @relc 15 Oct 2021
i often think of it like if you have a zebra and a horse. you can paint the horse but it does not become a zebra.
reply
29 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 15 Oct 2021
We’ll be non-custodial and decentralized by the end of next year. I’d love SN TO get hit with some kind of legal thing though. We can really use the PR.
reply
12 sats \ 1 boost \ 0 replies \ @rheedi0 15 Oct 2021
👀 Looking forward to seeing how you design this
reply