pull down to refresh

It’s absolutely what I was getting at. Love hearing insights like this. The regulatory burden for all businesses is increasingly prohibitive.
Go to Colombia, Paraguay or many other traditionally ‘backwards’ countries and all you need to do is pay the money upfront and if you’re motivated you could open a store next week. This I suspect was how it used to be in the West, very agile and entrepreneurial. That feels alien now. Opening a physical store/restaurant/hotel in Canada, Europe or U.S these days requires probably that you want to do it for the passion, not for a decent living or for the profit motive. Especially given the paperwork involved & setup costs involved.
If you can even imagine it, there were periods where you didn't even have to pay the money upfront. If you felt like starting a business, you just started a business.
reply
deleted by author
reply
There are definitely some sole proprietors who provide off the books services, but the idea of having a brick-and-mortar store without state permission is very foreign to us. I'm glad you've experienced that degree of freedom first hand.
reply
Well said.
reply
deleted by author
reply
This is a rabbit hole I only started uncovering. I'm also in the camp: "I want to have a business but not at the condition of becoming a circus monkey." A handbook about trusts, a way to do commerce without handing over sovereignty: https://drydenwire.com/site/assets/files/30245/weisss-trustee-handbook.pdf
reply
yes, otherwise you need to obey their rules once you register the business there, must have other options, especially now that with freedom money - if not using their money, why still voluntarily to play their games?
reply
and money is a big part of the jurisdiction game, since fiat is copyrighted. eg if anywhere in the world there's a contract denominated in USD the US Inc and FED can claim jurisdiction
reply
deleted by author
reply
Haha. This is awesome. Stealing it.
reply