I Leaked My IP Address! (2022) \ stacker news ~security

why no intro of this territory 🧐 I def want to learn more tips!

edited:

and I feel like security and privacy have so many things in common, why not cocreate together @davidw @ekzyis the stronger the force, more fun would have ) and you have time to take breaks:)!

now it's way too many territories, but less is more - focus is a super power.

31 sats \ 48 replies \ @ek OP 17 Dec 2023

and I feel like security and privacy have so many things in common

Yes but those are still different things.

For example, things can be secure and not private or private and not secure or both or neither of those.

I will leave this as an exercise to the reader to fill out this table with examples :)

	Secure	Not Secure
Private
Not Private

31 sats \ 46 replies \ @davidw 17 Dec 2023

I don’t see the distinction myself personally. Tech covers things not privacy related, but each to their own. I’m sure we’ll see plenty of parallels and competition with territories.

260 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

as a reader, all I want is go to the same place to read all the good stuff easily, don't really care which territory tbh 🫣

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 17 Dec 2023

100%. I foresee the ‘hot’ feed will in name or functionality become a ‘for you’ screen, allowing you to tweak and see your faves all in that one place.

Makes sense it is a bit segregated for now given the team didn’t foresee it being this popular.

Tagging multiple territories could help. Or having sub-territories. Although there’s currently no incentive, even if it were possible today to do, to house them inside one another. But I guess there will be once they get big enough and enough eyes on them and people may choose to relocate their horses & crew.

0 sats \ 43 replies \ @ek OP 17 Dec 2023

I don’t see the distinction myself personally.

You mean you see no distinction between security and privacy?

Example for secure but not private systems: Gmail.

I would say Google does all it can to not leak your mails (keep them secure). But are your mails really private? Can you tell Google: Hey, you can read this mail but please don't read this one? Or even: Please don't read any mail because SMTP is using plaintext because it's an old protocol from the early days of the Internet?

Tech covers things not privacy related, but each to their own.

We're here in the recently founded ~security, not ~tech

I’m sure we’ll see plenty of parallels and competition with territories.

I'm not trying to compete with you, if you took this territory this way

Are we already entering the territory battle phase? Things really move fast, lol

334 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

reminded me of what I learnt in this video (15:58), he said men's brains are made up of little boxes, and they are all unconnected; women's brain are like the internet superhighway, everything is connected 😂

for me, damn aren't they the same? for @ekzyis no, they are different!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 17 Dec 2023

for me, damn aren't they the same? for @ekzyis no, they are different!

If they would be the same, why even have two distinct terms for it?

Can you always replace "it's secure" with "it's private"?

Food for thought... Or blog posts, lol :)

he said men's brains are made up of little boxes, and they are all unconnected; women's brain are like the internet superhighway, everything is connected 😂😂

Btw, I lol'd and can see what you mean but no time to write anything further, lol :)

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

deleted by author

202 sats \ 39 replies \ @davidw 17 Dec 2023

I see a small technical distinction, but not a real need for a new territory. I get it and I am biased… I’m sure there’ll be loads of great content here and it’ll add to the conversation. But it could also sit inside ~tech really nicely is my point.

I just worry we dilute SN content because of technicalities or people’s desire for power over territories, not around common-sense groupings and what’s best for all stackers.

The distinction is like someone creating a ~predictions or ~bets territory, both have a different definition to an ~oracle… but would be better served inside that space. Assume they’ll be able to be moved however, so probably just a temp thing.

202 sats \ 37 replies \ @ek OP 17 Dec 2023

But it could also sit inside ~tech really nicely is my point.

Ah, now I see what you mean. Yes, that makes sense for this post.

But I also want to talk about stuff like social engineering here. That's not really related to tech for me.

For example, how I socially engineered my way into internal SN comms, lol

351 sats \ 36 replies \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

But I also want to talk about social engineering stuff here. That's not really related to tech for me.

ohhhhhhh 👀 fun stuff! see, this territory def lack an intro here.

0 sats \ 35 replies \ @ek OP 18 Dec 2023

I will let this discussion be the intro, lol :)

I also updated the territory description.

view replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

I just worry we dilute SN content because of technicalities or people’s desire for power over territories, not around common-sense groupings and what’s best for all stackers.

well said!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 17 Dec 2023

but then they have the same goal - to stay safe 👀