"Man's Search for Meaning" written by Viktor E. Frankl in 1946
What is it about (short version)? A renowned psychiatrist-neurologists personal experiences as a prisoner in the Nazi death camps during World War 2, his search for purpose and fulfilment in life and how it informed his later work.
What is it about (long version)? Published after Frankl's release from Auschwitz, his account explores human resilience and offers insights into the search for purpose and significance. It is a genuinely haunting memoir and introspective journey through the depths of human suffering and the hunt for meaning in life by a renowned pre-war psychiatrist-neurologist.
Through the horror and loss (his mother, father, brother and wife all perished), he observed a common thread that those with a sense of purpose and reason to survive could endure their suffering with remarkable fortitude. This observation became the foundation of logotherapy, emphasising the search for meaning as the primary motivator of human existence.
The book is divided into two parts. In the first, Frankl recounts his experiences in the concentration camps, vividly describing the physical and psychological challenges he faced, while also delving into the emotional toll of witnessing such human degradation and cruelty. In the background of such harrowing conditions, he develops a concept that even in the face of extreme adversity, an individual can still possess the freedom to choose their response, thus preserving their human dignity.
The second part introduces Frankl's philosophy of logotherapy ('healing through meaning') and explores the three primary avenues through which meaning can be found: creating work or a deed, experiencing love and connection with someone and adopting an attitude of acceptance toward suffering. By drawing upon his own experiences and those of his patients, Frankl articulates his theory that meaning cannot be imposed upon individuals from external sources, but must be discovered within one's own life.
Man's Search for Meaning is a profound work that serves as a testament to the human spirit under terrible adversity and a valuable guide for anyone seeking personal development. The book challenges us to reflect, to question our meaning and purpose, and to consider the ways in which we can contribute to the betterment of society.
“Between stimulus and response lies a space. In that space lie our freedom and power to choose a response. In our response lies our growth and our happiness.”
Should I read it? The book itself is relatively short, the writing style eloquent and accessible and the narrative makes a compelling read. His use of first-hand experiences paired with psychological insight invokes a real sense of empathy and connection. Admittedly I first read the book having been recommended it by Stephen R Covey and the Franklin-Covey group, so i was coming at it from a different perspective to most. I would recommend it to anyone to read 'blind' and see where it leads them.
Anyone else write like this? There are a wealth of books in the self-help category, however, for books about the triumph of the human spirit against the backdrop of adversity (in a similar vein) I would say Primo Levi and Alexander Solzenitsyn are good places to start.
Does it have any Bitcoin in it? No. However, it offers interest to the economically inclined given the book explores the concept of finding meaning and purpose beyond economic success. By considering value beyond the financial there are insights into the broader impacts of economic systems on the individual and society as a whole. Also, the concept of deriving meaning and fulfilment from work can also provide personal insight into your own motivations and the long-term sustainability of your labour… perhaps allowing us to develop a better work-life balance.
9/10
One of the wisest and most beautiful books ever written, I think. Hugely influential.
reply
Also: this is an interesting use case to see what the improved "related posts" feature turns up.
reply
People either seem to be moved by it or haven’t heard of it at all. Sits just above ‘Diving Bell and the Butterfly’ and ‘Million Little Pieces’ for sheer impact of a narrative.
reply
Diving Bell is another gut punch. Damn was that powerful.
reply
93 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs 16 Jan
Yeah, no. It's not my sort of book.
I don't like the style of writing, nor the words used and it's written fairly academic as well in my opinion, simply doesn't work for me.
reply
Fair enough.
reply
I devoured your review. The question that comes to my mind is, why hasn’t the term ‘logotherapy’ become mainstream yet? It sounds a bit similar to the Japanese word, ikigai, which means living according to one’s life purpose. I have heard of Viktor and his sufferings before, but “logotherapy” is something TIL
reply
why hasn’t the term ‘logotherapy’ become mainstream yet?
'Mainstream' is a high bar for a term of art, but in counselling psychology I'd say that most people know what it is. Also keep in mind that this is now, what, sixty years old? So pieces of this migrate elsewhere. In modern therapeutic traditions, meaning-making is a significant part of it.
reply
No idea. I’m no expert on psychotherapy but it’s my understanding that it is still being used today. As a concept it sits within the Viennese psychoanalytical tradition and based on your comments makes me think that getting to ‘ones life purpose’ can be via science or spirituality… perhaps both.
reply
Such an incredible book. I haven't read it in so many years. I need to pick it up again.
reply
Re- rereading it for this article was interesting. I found myself dwelling on different parts than before - specifically the interpretation rather than the narrative. (Apologies - not explaining that very well!)
reply
My memory is fading as I get older, but this book sticks with me even though I actually read it 50 years ago in high school. Damn, I'm old. Great writeup, as usual. Thanks.
reply
Was it on high-school reading lists?
reply
Yes it was. Everyone in school had to read it.
reply
Which may explain why it’s better known in the US. ‘The diary of Anne Frank’ is used in European schools, probably because the protagonist is more relatable to young readers.
reply
That was required reading also. I believe it was required for a younger student.
reply
Really doubling down on the horrors of the Nazi’s.
Having been to some of the camps I can honestly say no book prepares you for the feeling of absolute despair and evil that is in the very ground beneath your feet. No bird song, everything monochrome and just sadness in every moment..
reply
Same school, we visited Dachau when I was 15. Horrifying.
reply
Same. That’s probably the most impressionable age to do it; you think you understand just enough and then the reality hits you.
Have a long plane right coming up. Just downloaded will give it a shot.
reply
On my list to read. My wife read it and recommends it.
reply
On the average, only those prisoners could keep alive who, after years of trekking from camp to camp, had lost all scruples in their fight for existence; they were prepared to use every means, honest and otherwise, even brutal force, theft, and betrayal of their friends, in order to save themselves. We who have come back, by the aid of many lucky chances or miracles - whatever one may choose to call them - we know: the best of us did not return.
Haunting.
reply