The comments this post received really got me thinking about more important things than the name. First of all, should this territory even exist? @benthecarman doesn't think so. He might be right. I will give this thought before next month's fees are due. @DarthCoin feels like it should only exist if moderated. That makes sense, to the extent that it would prevent crappy, confusing links to be posted. On the other hand, I have an aversion to moderation, and I'm always suspicious of anyone claiming the mantle of supreme oracle, who gets to decide what's good or bad. I actually considered a moderation form that is based on crowd sourcing. Let a consensus of stackers decide what is the best learning material. I don't know whether that's possible, though.
The beauty of stacker news is that it lets the market decide
reply
Territories have been created for a reason
reply
Assuming I don't take your advice, I wonder if moderation based on zaprank would improve the territory? Perhaps culling all posts deeming crappy by consensus?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @mo OP 13 Feb
@DarthCoin guides could exist in this territory. Think about the day you founded: what was the aim? Probably something that was not offered in the main bitcoin territory.
True is that name make little difference, the contest does much more for a territory to be successful.
You'll always find people against you. Believe in your vision and blindly ignore the noise!
reply
Ben is right, the whole territory doesn't make sense. We better use /bitcoin to educate newbies directly, when is the case. My guides could be pointed when are needed. I am still not convinced if have to be in a separate repository. Also are many other good guides out there and video tutorials, my guides are quite niche.
I would agree with a special section for newbies, where they can find some guidance, with curated content, and mostly about how to use SN and BTC/LN. Who to approve this section or maintain it? I don't know, I don't want to be that judge, I was already accused of too many things.
reply