Marathon Launches Slipstream, a Transaction Acceleration Serviceir.mara.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1343/marathon-digital-holdings-launches-slipstream
2500 sats \ 11 comments \ @k00b 22 Feb bitcoin
write
preview
related posts
526 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln 22 Feb
By default, Bitcoin nodes frequently exclude large and non-standard transactions from Bitcoin’s mempool, even if these transactions adhere to the Bitcoin network’s consensus rules. As a result, complex Bitcoin transactions are often delayed or unprocessed. To encourage experimentation and development on Bitcoin and to enable and expedite the processing of large or complex transactions that comply with Bitcoin’s protocol, Marathon has launched Slipstream.
Is this a reaction to Ocean filtering transactions?
Marathon is the first Bitcoin mining company to offer a direct transaction submission service.
Haven't there always been ways to get pools to accept transactions directly?
Maybe I am completely missing the point. I have no experience in this.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 22 Feb
Is this a reaction to Ocean filtering transactions?
It could be. Before Ocean there were still incentives to do this though.
Haven't there always been ways to get pools to accept transactions directly?
Yes, some more easily than others. There's been a lot more interest recently. mempool.space launched an acceleration service sometime last year.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @oomahq 23 Feb
Correct, seems just marketing.
reply
516 sats \ 3 replies \ @freetx 22 Feb
This is expected I suppose....as subsidy gets cut miners will need to come up with additional revenue schemes.
I'm willing to bet someone comes up with a "monthly service" fee for large customers. Something like pay X sats and get fast-lane access for the entire month....
reply
188 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 22 Feb
I'm willing to bet someone comes up with a "monthly service" fee for large customers.
Not a bad idea. Although I wonder how regularly people use these services.
reply
516 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 22 Feb
Maybe payment processors + Exchanges + large financial institutions would.
The unknown is if your pool doesn't win the next several blocks...but I guess the argument is if a large mining pool has 20% of the hash rate, then they should get 1 out of ever 5 blocks on average.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @oomahq 23 Feb
Nah, this is basically for getting non-standard TXs on the chain.
Payment processors, exchanges and large financial institutions doing normal TXs don't have any need to bypass the spam filters. Going through the normal mempool is cheaper and faster.
reply
308 sats \ 1 reply \ @DudeJLebowski 23 Feb
No surprise, Marathon are bad actors.
The sooner we upgrade the default filtering to include the latest batch of exploits the better. Miners will fall in line, as usual.
Like it or not, Core policy is seen as a proxy for consensus and miners take direction from that. Core devs are letting Bitcoin down right now.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @02ac4a7bd5 23 Feb freebie
Change consensus if you want to change Bitcoin.
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 23 Feb
Via BTC has been doing this for years. Where did this word "acceleration" come from?
mempool.space
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SaToSHiWoMaN 24 Feb outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.