pull down to refresh
1008 sats \ 5 replies \ @frostdragon 6 Mar \ on: Zap to help a scammed stacker get their sats back - WTF is going on here? meta
I have to admit, I should have thought a little longer before making the "Zap to help a scammed stacker" post. Honestly should have just forwarded the sats to the original post, because that would have had the same effect anyway. I might have unintentionally made the situation look sketchy, but fortunately the boost sats go back to the community anyway, so I'm ok with my mistake.
This was all pretty simple in my head - I just thought making separate post w/ boost would rally the community to help someone out, but that's not the vibe here, and that's ok. I didn't really stop to think that might look sketchy, and I don't blame anyone for being confused for thinking that.
As far as proving that @BlokchainB isn't an alt account, @ek made a good point that that it's not something that can be 100% proved, but I will say that if we were alt accounts, this would be an insane amount of effort only to shell out a total of 50k sats with no real incentive... So that'd be weird. but maybe that's what I/we want you to think....
In any case, k00b's solutions for disincentivizing alt accounts for the purpose of sat farming as, in my opinion, simple, elegant, and effective.
Sorry for all the confusion, I'm genuinely not trying to troll anyone.
Happy stacking.
Thanks for clarifying it @frostdragon and sorry for misunderstanding you.
reply
No worries boo
reply
I think your post and @Tef's comment were fine. I am glad we are having this discussion. :)
I think you simply followed through with your way of showing appreciation and condolences to a fellow stacker which many other stackers also did, just not in the way you did. They probably simply didn't think as much about the post as you seem to have done. And that's very honorable of you! I smiled when I saw this post and the challenge so I zapped it a little but making a challenge out of it might have been too much, haha
While on the other hand, @Tef might have actually done something similar: they mentioned what many stackers might had in the back of their mind when reading this post but didn't want to challenge the tone of this post for whatever reason. I am glad @Tef mentioned that since it allows others to engage in the discussion.
I think we need more people like both of you. Less compliance, more authenticity.