174 sats \ 10 replies \ @ek 6 Mar \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
https://m.stacker.news/19205
kind of run out of ideas at the end. wasn't easy to come up with territory suggestions ngl
write
preview
51 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar
There are some used territories you could offer.
reply
26 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 7 Mar
Soon™
Which do you have in mind?
111
reply
51 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar
Does it matter which one, since the buyer can just change the name?
reply
26 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 7 Mar freebie
Mhh, good point. But the content will still be there until we added a checkbox to make the old content disappear.
But if you're going to rename a territory (and the old content is gone), it wouldn't matter if you buy it used or create a new one, no?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar
Good point, maybe you need to offer a discount to unarchive a territory, since it's used.
reply
26 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 7 Mar freebie
What makes an used territory worse than a new territory?
kind of fishing for your econ experience
reply
217 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar
Like you said, it comes with a bunch of archived posts that already proved to be not worth the cost of a territory.
Now, it certainly could be the case that a particular archive is valued by a buyer. My suggestion would be to auction off the archived territories, but don't let the buyers delete the archives.
reply
26 sats \ 1 reply \ @OneOneSeven 7 Mar
"Comes with the territory"
view replies
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Mar
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/aJy-U7Z57hjTNDccMMHn0g6a6M47KIoB9uCRyMjj8Eg/rs:fit:1920:1080/aHR0cHM6Ly9tLnN0YWNrZXIubmV3cy80MjEy
reply