reply on: Stacker Saloon \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

51 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

There are some used territories you could offer.

26 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 7 Mar

Soon™

Which do you have in mind?

111

51 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar

Does it matter which one, since the buyer can just change the name?

26 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 7 Mar freebie

Mhh, good point. But the content will still be there until we added a checkbox to make the old content disappear.

But if you're going to rename a territory (and the old content is gone), it wouldn't matter if you buy it used or create a new one, no?

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar

Good point, maybe you need to offer a discount to unarchive a territory, since it's used.

26 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 7 Mar freebie

What makes an used territory worse than a new territory?

kind of fishing for your econ experience

217 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Mar

Like you said, it comes with a bunch of archived posts that already proved to be not worth the cost of a territory.

Now, it certainly could be the case that a particular archive is valued by a buyer. My suggestion would be to auction off the archived territories, but don't let the buyers delete the archives.