21 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby OP 9 Mar \ parent \ on: AGREE/DISAGREE: Everyone will eventually be able to self-custody bitcoin bitcoin
Better custodians sounds good. There is a sense though that anything less than self-custody is a betrayal of cypherpunkism and the sainted satoshi.
write
preview
108 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 9 Mar
I recommend you to listen that last dispatch with Odel and Voltage team. They are talking about a lot of things and also about custodians. Here: #455228
I am a strong believer in the "uncle Jim" method. Just think about a "LN bank" in each household. Not for a single user, but maybe 4-5-10 users. That is already a lot.
Not every people must be a 100% "cypherpunk"...
reply
38 sats \ 0 replies \ @Atreus 9 Mar
Darth I was just thinking about this topic a few hours ago & your link is right on time. Thanks for posting!
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kytt 9 Mar
Do you have any guides on being an Uncle Jim? I've been considering just waiting on eCash to get out of beta so I can use that and also take advantage of offline payments. What do you think?
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 9 Mar
Plenty here, by category https://darth-coin.github.io/ Also here: #330346 I wrote so many guides on SN, that I get tired.
reply