reply on: Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

21 sats \ 14 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness is a Keynesian Beauty Contest meta

I was wrong. Ek clarified the other day they are not on the board. I @ you but I dont think you saw it.

0 sats \ 13 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

Oh ok. I was pretty excited when I thought I was two spots higher than I am.

Who are those other two, then?

Yes I was disappointed too. Still not sure who the other two are. It was speculated that it could be someone who is not that active but is zapping huge amounts of sats.

20 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

Ah, the legendary nemo I imagine. Still, there are four categories that are equally weighted. It should be almost impossible to be at the top just from excelling in the zapping categories.

50 sats \ 10 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

My hypothesis is that it's one of the AMA hosts. Two of them are right after siggy on the top posts list for the month. If they also zapped a bunch of comments and got a bunch of their own comments zapped, then their scores will be pretty good.

82 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar

I guess if I was optimizing for highest placement I should have run the pool out of my account.

60 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

You really should have. It was kind of a pain having to do the accounting for the in-season tournament, though, so I get why you'd rather use an account that just fully pays out.

21 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 21 Mar

I see the hacker news bot is in the top 20. Do you think oracle could be in the top 3.

50 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 21 Mar

I was going to ask at some point if oracle was excluded. It seems like it would be, right?