Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #836133 \ stacker news ~oracle

Million Sat Madness Leaderboard — #836133

2267 sats \ 95 comments \ @0xbitcoiner 24 Mar oracle

Not much has changed since last Sunday. The only difference I see is that @Scoresby has come out of the shadows and the other hidden stacker has climbed the table. Only one week left of this madness, may the most deserving one win. Place your bets... 🤠

view all related items

154 sats \ 11 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

Great! I know two of the top three. One is @siggy47 and second one is @Natalia

20 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

That's a plausible prediction. The data is out there, so place your bets! :)

28 sats \ 6 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

I just wonder and wonder again who's the third one! That's getting down to some blockbuster finish. Isn't it?

41 sats \ 4 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 24 Mar

could be @carlosfandango? 🤔

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

No, absolutely not. Currently he's not there. However, I wish him all the best and will be very happy for him if he tops.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

No, he is someone who zaps the most. 😜

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

It feels like we're in a suspense movie.

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

40 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

Yes, there are some serious contenders of course. @davidw is really the one to look at. @0xbitcoineris is working real hard.

There's ample time to trade places and who knows someone has been saving his best for the last moment. Competitions running for such long duration require strategic planning as well.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

171 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 24 Mar

That mystery stacker leaped over the tall building that is scoresby, grayruby, undisciplined and 0xbitcoiner in a single bound.

61 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

Looks like a genuine cowboy to me. Yee-haw! 🤠

148 sats \ 37 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Mar

Is that @Natalia, who just jumped over us?

I've speculated that three of those are from AMA's and the other is Siggy. Any better theories out there?

62 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 24 Mar

I don't know anything, me keep writing. 👀

84 sats \ 33 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

84 sats \ 31 replies \ @Natalia 24 Mar

I also think @nemo is here. 👀

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

I don't think so. @nemo is still here but he isn't posting and commenting, so there's hardly any chance for him.

17 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 24 Mar

#478552

30 sats \ 28 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

Who is Nemo ?

26 sats \ 27 replies \ @Natalia 24 Mar

you don't know @nemo?

20 sats \ 26 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

I have no memories. It must have escaped this madness before I showed up.

42 sats \ 25 replies \ @ek 24 Mar

we might need a weekly @nemo memorial day

30 sats \ 22 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

I could go look at his profile, but I'd rather wait until the memorial.

view replies

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 24 Mar

😂😂😂

view replies

787 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Mar

Natalia could be anywhere.

Nemo hasn't been posting or commenting, so I think it would be hard to be towards the top just through zapping.

62 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 24 Mar

I would guess it is Natalia. Keep in mind, I have been wrong about everything relating to this contest. I can't wait for it to be over but I am so deep in sunk cost at this point I can't relent.

62 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

It's hard to say with any certainty, but I think Natalia will be in the top 10. I would exclude those from AMA.

102 sats \ 3 replies \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

30 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

This is actually quite interesting. Does that mean you're the 14th one right now? 😂

👀🫵

26 sats \ 1 reply \ @carlosfandango 24 Mar

deleted by author

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

😂

115 sats \ 21 replies \ @Scoresby 24 Mar

Yeah, I figured people should get to know who's competing with them.

124 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

Fair enough, I've kept it because I think it's funnier, just a bit of spice :)

48 sats \ 19 replies \ @oliverweiss 24 Mar

This is nice of you, would be great if others follow your example.

7799 sats \ 18 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

I understand everyone's sentiment, but doesn't it seem weird that we're all playing this little fiat game, keeping score, and we are angry at those who want to maintain their privacy? We give it all up for a stupid game? What's next? Should we ask everyone how big their stash is? Can I see your cold card, please?

133 sats \ 8 replies \ @Scoresby 24 Mar

Fair point, siggy. I wish I could keep my total (all-time) amount stacked hidden, but reveal my place in the ranking.

I think if SN is going to do it as a competition with a leaderboard, it probably should have been an opt-in competition where competitors couldn't hide their identity.

I see a lot of people putting a lot of effort into great content. Under normal SN rules, you get zapped and that's great. Maybe you get a share of the reward pool and that's awesome.

But the MSM puts emphasis on how rankings aren't purely about who stacks most. So then, you are trying to figure out how the ranking works, to see if you can write stuff that will earn you more. But it's really hard to tell what one should do to be a top stacker when you don't know who the top stackers are.

This is part of why I made myself public. I figured other competitors should be able to see what I post, how often I comment and draw some conclusions from where that puts me rank-wise, rather than having to guess.

I've kept my total stacked hidden for as long as I remember that being an option, because I agree that privacy is important. But since I am legitimately trying to participate in MSM and claw my way to a higher prize, I think people should get to see it in the open.

193 sats \ 6 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

You raise all good points, starting with the fact that it should have been an opt in, although it wouldn't have been a real choice if rewards only went to participants. Short of that, there could have been some heads up about this plan. I already bored everyone with my feelings when this thing was announced, but now the peer pressure to sacrifice your privacy is difficult to take.

156 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby 24 Mar

Stay strong! Don't sacrifice it.

I'm curious how you would feel about it if numbers (total stacked, estimated reward) were hidden but names were not.

240 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

I feel like it's the principle of the matter. I wouldn't like names exposed. As it is, the heuristics here expose privacy anyway. More accurately than chainalysis. I don't want to get all self righteous, but I played fiat games, score keeping and keeping up with the Joneses my whole life. I'm pretty old, and I'm sick of it. I will agree with you that content here has certainly improved, and that's a plus.

203 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 24 Mar

It's really tricky: some of what SN is doing (at least as far as I get it) is using money to moderate a public forum.

This should be awesome. Skin in the game, less spam, value for value, markets...it all works together to incentive interesting interactions and content.

But in order to do that, some of the information has to be visible so we can all make choices about what to read.

This inevitably creates privacy issues and keeping up with the Joneses effects.

March has put a fine point on it with MSM. It was easier to ignore under normal SN rules. But also has incentivized some interesting content and interactions.

view replies

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

I wish I could keep my total (all-time) amount stacked hidden, but reveal my place in the ranking.

this

119 sats \ 4 replies \ @oliverweiss 24 Mar

It’s curiosity. I am not angry at all, nor jealous or what. I respect everyone’s decision to hide their records, all fine with me. It would be great if they do though, so I know who is in the lead, but this is only because I am curious.

128 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

I didn't want to stick this on you particularly. Sorry. I should have just commented rather than replied. I just don't like how this has been run, and particularly limiting rewards to 64 stackers.

103 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

It's my gut feeling that there will be some changes.

86 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 24 Mar

No worries! I understand your point :)

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 24 Mar

103 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

You're absolutely correct. But, I don't think anyone's angry here. Instead we are just enjoying the every moment of suspense.

27 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

Well, a few people have seemed angry, though not in this post. Don't get me wrong. I get it. I love games, and I'm competitive as hell. I try to keep that side of me in check😀

113 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 24 Mar

Take their Anger as fuel for your passion and March ahead dear @siggy47. You're one of the best stackers we have here. You deserve it. All the very best for MSM.

37 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 24 Mar

Thanks for the kind words, but I'm not angry at anybody. There are a bunch of good people on SN. That's why I'm here. This MSM just rubs me the wrong way.