I propose territory owners have the option to move any thread in their territory they don't think belongs into a new territory called 'miscellaneous' or 'other' or something similar. Revenue from that territory could go to Stacker.News
pull down to refresh
145 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 28 Mar
Back in the day meta did serve as a miscellaneous category. I'm not sure owners would have the incentive to give up revenue, even if the post was placed inappropriately
reply
97 sats \ 0 replies \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar
Good point. If it gave revenue to stacker that would be something, but you are right. Maybe the revenue already generated stays, but the territory owner has to pay the 'miscellaneous' fee to send it?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 28 Mar
I like the idea, but I think you'd have to refund their post fee.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @TNStacker 28 Mar
Why would meta not be misc?
reply
52 sats \ 1 reply \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar
It's not what the word means. Traditionally used to denote content that relates to the site on which it resides.
https://m.stacker.news/23609
i.e. 'meta' would mean content about Stacker.News -- posts about Stacker.News show on YT, suggestions for the site, announcements of new features, announcements about rewards, stuff like that. If you look, that's about half of the content in ~meta - showing that many know and understand the traditional definition.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 28 Mar
Thanks. I was working from a higher-level, all-encompassing perspective, but you're right. It is high-level, all encompassing, but on a subject area, not everything.
reply
38 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 28 Mar
Meta will be a defacto place to post all the stuff that fits in more than one territory since we don't have cross posting yet and a place to post when you don't want to pay the high territory posting fees some territories are currently featuring.
I had two different posts recently where I was going to post them in a specific territory but the posting fee was 1000 sats whereas I could just post them in Meta for 210 sats so it was a no brainer to just post in Meta. I want to support territories but it's not a charity. I am not going to pay 1000 sats fee for a post that might not get 1000 sats in zaps.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar
I can see how that is needed, I agree. My preference I guess would be that 'meta' means what it traditionally means - posts about the site itself, and that some territory were created for the purposes you describe (misc mebbe).
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 28 Mar
I think a misc territory could be useful but to your point most people use meta for misc so not sure how popular another territory would be.
reply
31 sats \ 2 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 28 Mar
Always has been 👨🚀🔫👨🚀 meme.
Meta is where ~Stacker_Sports grew from and ~Music via the "Meta Music Mondays".
Meta, has a real SN history to it.
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 29 Mar
Ah, I see, I'm ignorant of that. Thanks!
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 29 Mar
SNs grown loads and rapidly. The music territory before it existed was just one post a week on a Monday, in a meta takeover. Stacker sports did theirs daily. It was (in my mind) GRs consistency with the daily stacker sports meta take overs that paved the way for territories. Which are still kinda figuring themselves out, but once the dust settles I think they will show to have value.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 28 Mar
meta for me is you can post anything there other than Bitcoin. 😂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar freebie
I bet you're right. I like your recent post (and glad I saw it). I'm not sure that isn't what is intended by the devs.
OTOH, I would like to be able to look at just posts about stacker.news itself sometimes.
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 28 Mar
I've suggested in the past that territory owners should be able to "expel" posts from their territory if they don't think they belong. The post would be hidden and the OP would be notified. In that post, the OP would have the option to:
- Leave the post hidden
- Delete the post
- Edit the post to make it fit the territory
- Appeal the decision of the territory owner
- Change post territory
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar
Great ideas here too. I like the options.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 28 Mar
I wonder if making the Territory Details box visible on the "post" page might help deter some mis-sent posts (in Meta and in some other territories).
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @UCantDoThatDotNet OP 28 Mar
That's a great idea. It could display on 'recent' and 'top' views within the territory as well. I think it should be more prominent. I hear there are some UI changes on the way.
reply