This isn't your 6969th post according to the item count in your profile 👀
I believe he was sad to discover that he just missed out on his own 6969.
If you're only earning sats and not zapping others, not only are you letting them down, you're letting yourself down.
I would add here that some stackers mentioned that they do notice and remember if they don't get zapped back. It's like some form of unwritten rule around here: if you get zapped in a thread with someone, you zap back; at least as a "I have read your reply"-zap. Amount is negotiable.
This is a random way to bring this up but I have a feature request…
  • filtering on posts should probably change the count from ‘6969 items’ to ‘69 posts’.
  • It’s a little confusing currently how many posts/comments people have.
  • can see why, given the amount of flexible filtering options there.
  • filters could probably also only show if stacker has any of them
reply
Lame Excuse 1: You can't commemorate something before it's happened. Lame Excuse 2: I was managing a bunch of different conversations and lost count.
You're right to point out that you have to give if you expect to receive. How are you not married? You seem like a wise young man.
reply
How are you not married? You seem like a wise young man.
Maybe I'm having too much fun on my own already
reply
I'm having too much fun on my own
probably why you missed your own 6969
reply