101 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Apr \ parent \ on: How many people actually buy bitcoin 100% non-KYC? bitcoin
You are the one making literally their language to matter by segregating in two types of bitcoin.
KYC is bad but have nothing to do with BTC.
I've started to refer to kyc-free as anonymous bitcoin
I think DarthCoin is right re: don't use kyc-language to refer to your bitcoin
I feel it is more accurate to refer to kyc bitcoin as non-anonymous bitcoin
Fwiw it's simple now to convert your non-anonymous bitcoin to anonymous:
- buy hashrate
- mine bitcoin
- anonymous bitcoin sent daily to your btc address
You can do this at my project - rigly.io - or miningrigrentals.com or NiceHash
reply
You sell hash rate?
I am interested
reply
reply
reject nocoiner orthodoxy.
reply
Let's say I am sending you now 1000 sats to whatever LN address you want.
Please find the UTXO I received from a KYC exchange 7 years ago and I use it to refill my SN account.
Are those sats "non-ethical"? How can you differentiate them from others?
YOU CAN'T. There's no way to find back that UTXO. Nobody can do that.
If you will be able to differentiate them, then Bitcoin will be dead. Right now dead.
reply
I am talking about communicating with nocoiners and precoiners who are using "kyc" framing, not the mechanics of chain surveillance, but you make a great point.
Please meme how you want. I will continue to be a karen on twitter and reject "kyc and kycfree" framing in the trenches.
reply