pull down to refresh

If it isn't Bitcoin, you will be ignored on Stacker?
907 sats \ 11 comments \ @DesertDave 5 Apr alter_native
From the SN guide:
Content That Gets Ignored Generally speaking, referral links, repetitive content, and posts that are not related to Bitcoin, Nostr, or tech tend to be ignored by the Stacker News community.
Why are we telling people that they will be ignored if they don't want to talk only bitcoin. This is not inclusive for new people. Why can stacker not be much bigger than just bitcoin? I want it to be for everyone.
I would love to hear your thoughts on this.
write
preview
related posts
197 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 5 Apr freebie
The majority of my posts since coming here have not been related to Bitcoin (and the majority might even not have been tech related -- too lazy to check). I think I'm both doing okay here in terms of engagement/stacking, and having fun. I do read a ton of the Bitcoin content (and even comment on some), but definitely appreciate the other areas of interest.
I wonder if that was written pre-territories?
(And yes, the most significant post I made today was about BTC, but that's timing for you.)
reply
75 sats \ 5 replies \ @DesertDave OP 5 Apr
Will you please update. Stacker news for ALL. @kr
reply
202 sats \ 4 replies \ @kr 5 Apr
yes, will fix - the guide needs a full refresh at some point but will get this done today
reply
133 sats \ 3 replies \ @DesertDave OP 5 Apr
Wow. That actually worked. Amazing. I appreciate it. I love it here and I want all my no coiner friends to check it out.
reply
234 sats \ 2 replies \ @kr 5 Apr
awesome, we’ve just fixed some issues with invite links so you can set all your friends up with some sats when you invite them!
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 5 Apr
I didn't even know invite links was a thing. amazing.
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 5 Apr
Fantastic. You all are killing it. I'm really excited to see where it goes
reply
61 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 5 Apr
I think this is just a case of old text from the days when there were just a few territories. I'm sure it will be updated soon.
reply
75 sats \ 2 replies \ @DesertDave OP 5 Apr
That makes sense. How do we get it updated?
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 5 Apr
You tag the person that wrote it @kr
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 5 Apr
You can let @k00b or @ek know about it, but they have probably already seen your post.
reply