96 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 23 May
Iām impressed with how she pointed out a profound truth with a few paragraphs n simple words š
reply
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 23 May
Yes, I saw this post yesterday. An excellent point.
The crypto industry is only interested in NGU none of the core principles of what crypto is supposed to be.
As evidenced by Coinbases stunt yesterday co-opting Bitcoin pizza day to promote USD payments on their layer 2 payment network on ethereum.
Honestly it's exhausting and disheartening that we have to go through another cycle with crypto being a thing.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 23 May
Part of the process, annoying process
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 24 May
Agreed
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @tolee 23 May
Let us retire NgU in lieu of VgU (value go up). These numbers that people obsess about are unreliable and will be increasingly disconnected from what this revolutionary store of VALUE provides.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 23 May
It's a good lesson in how things work, and the forces unfolding in the world and in btc. You don't have to like it, but it's worth looking clearly at it.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 23 May
Privacy will be valued more when the pods become reality
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 23 May
Yeah. It feels like privacy should cut across more political groups than other issues, but somehow it never does.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 23 May freebie
That is a bit true through.
If people would only unite and depower the government, we would all be more happy.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @02bcd3eeb0 23 May
Not relevant. It happened because the banks wanted it - crypto scammer lobbying is nothing compared to bank fraudster lobbying.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 23 May
Can you explain what you mean? No doubt the banks want it, and definitely lobbied for it. Lyn is talking about how the price action shows people care more about NGU than privacy and self custody.
reply