New York Times Editorial Board Says Biden Should Drop Out \ stacker news ~news

New York Times Editorial Board Says Biden Should Drop Out

666 sats \ 30 comments \ @siggy47 28 Jun news freebie

I haven't found an article about this yet. I just heard news reports. Here's one: https://www.golocalprov.com/politics/nyt-editorial-board-calls-on-biden-to-exit-race

In a highly unusual move, the editorial board of the New York Times published a Friday night editorial titled “To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race.”

Apparently the fact that this Editorial was published on a Friday night is a big deal.

view all related items

85 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 28 Jun freebie

Not surprised. It is interesting to see how the media works in concert. I was last night but not surprised to see this today. I thought as soon as the CNN/NBC people were actually being honest about the performance the knives were coming out.

The only people I see sugar coating are the ones that can't appear to be down on Biden.

26 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 28 Jun

Yes, like Chris Coons and Obama. And Fetterman, who reminds me of Lennie in Of Mice And Men. I'm surprised about Obama, but not Coons. He came out of the Delaware machine, and must stay loyal to the Biden Family capos.

64 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 28 Jun

One by one the knives come out.

64 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 28 Jun

This is the article in question

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/biden-election-debate-trump.html

But just today, the Biden team doubled down:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hes-not-dropping-out-biden-digs-after-disastrous-debate

175 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 28 Jun

Here is a unpaywalled version https://archive.is/vTzEv

176 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 28 Jun

From a purely practical stance, Biden's team absolutely has to deny he's stepping down or even considering it literally until he announces it (since the second he says he's even considering it, he has to drop out). I'm not taking the denials as meaningful.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatsMate 29 Jun

They are going to swap him out in September/October with Newsom. I just can't believe it has gotten this far to begin with!

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Akg10s33 29 Jun

In my opinion, a person of that age who has repeatedly been caught on camera in situations where he is left wandering or lost in space... should not run or continue in a political career... and go to rest and give opportunity to another..

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 29 Jun

This doesn't make NYT disloyal to Democratic party but to only Biden and correctly so because that's what they are told to do for Biden is definitely going sidelines and Newson will be the candidate.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinAbhi 29 Jun

Everyone thinks about their benefit. And by making some changes they come into limelight, that is why such decisions are taken.

54 sats \ 15 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

I dont know man. The media can be throwing curve balls. Did the NYT ever support Biden?

41 sats \ 9 replies \ @siggy47 OP 29 Jun

Sure. NYT only supports democrats.

54 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun

1956 NYT endorsed Eisenhower

52 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 29 Jun

The exception proves the rule.

54 sats \ 6 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

So maybe they are correct in this case. He didnt do so well in debate, not that trump really did much better.

62 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 OP 29 Jun

What a humiliating carnival for everyone involved.

54 sats \ 4 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

Yes. It shows how inept the american people are, too. To let those two run for office.

25 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun

No one challenged Biden except for RFK and Dean Phillips

The Democrats tried to cancel primary season

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

I do like this RFK guy.

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 29 Jun

We are pretty damn inept.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

Yeah, lately things havent been going well for our political system.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun

That’s a naive question

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 29 Jun

Why is it naive?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun

It’s not naive

It’s dumb and ignorant unless you live in a cave

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 29 Jun

Maybe I dont follow the NYT? Nor do I care about anything they say.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun

I don’t read NYT either and I also know they have not endorsed a Republican in my lifetime.

54 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 29 Jun freebie

Don't they prewrite multiple versions of (most of) this stuff and then update and release the version that matches the outcome?

126 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 29 Jun

I can confidently say no. This is a very unusual stance for the New York Times. In fact, it's never happened before. The NYT very rarely will turn disloyal to a democratic party politician.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullama 29 Jun

I think they probably do it only for the most important stuff, which this might be.

This reminded me of In Event of Moon Disaster

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NaOD 29 Jun outlawed

stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.