Acquiescence

Mail, including “court summons”, that are sent to you, if not replied to or returned, can be taken as your “acceptance” as you “acquiesced”.

Note: the time period for this is 30 days. Anything shorter than 30 days can be considered entrapment or frowned upon in court, unless an ongoing dispute is currently under way.

Acquiescence meaning: “the reluctant acceptance of something without protest”. Time to protest should be done within 30 days.

Note: the word protest is derived from the Latin word “prōtestārī” meaning “to declare publicly” and the root word “testārī” meaning “to testify”, ergo pro-test means to “testify publicly”.

However, as “the public” has now become a controlled jurisdiction, to “protest” is no longer a right, but a “privilege” that can be revoked at any time by those who control the “general public” or “community”.

Three letter approach:

You can use this acquiescence to your advantage as long as you use the three letter approach, meaning you have sent three or more letters or notices to the person you are making the claim against.

If they ignore you, they have “acquiesced” and accepted through tacit agreement.

Note: the shortest honourable amount of time for this three letter process is 10 days between correspondence, although it is still honourable to give 30 days with your first notice.

Also note: you must have proof of this in court.

110 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 29 Jun

And usually you reply with an affidavit that cannot be rebutted.

111 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 29 Jun

“protest” is no longer a right, but a “privilege”

It's weird that Public is said to be granted human rights at first place. Sadly, your rights are your prievelage now.

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @premitive1 29 Jun

If the public is a controlled jurisdiction how do individuals not a part of the court system have the right to make claims against others outside of the court system?

210 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 29 Jun

the right to make claims against others outside of the court system?

sign and make better contracts with those. A claim is when a contract was breached. Put strict rules and use insurances/escrow services in your contracts and you will never have to make any claim.

Everything in this fucked up world is based on contract law. When you buy a plane ticket, what do you think it is? A fucking contract and you must obey THEIR rules or come up with your own rules.

You should go to a court with jury of your peers only when is about a real crime: theft, damage or kill. Otherwise is just contract law.

100 sats \ 3 replies \ @Lux 29 Jun

You mention the individual, private living person, the man. You don't mention the ens legis all caps name in the papers. And be careful wich jurisdictions you are playing with

33 sats \ 2 replies \ @Hamstr 29 Jun

Basically force the judge, policeman, lawyer to state themselves as the living person?

160 sats \ 1 reply \ @Lux 29 Jun

#585770 #558541 #566154 #568649

Gotta know how court operates, only a jury of your peers can judge a sovereign living man, and for testimonies can request to be under oath as man.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Hamstr 30 Jun freebie

@Lux and @DarthCoin

I think I might be the most dangerous type of person ever born. I keep digging for more information. I'm a statutory U.S. Citizen, and resident of DC (Guam). I'm the best type of candidate the court wants to hire to become a judge, senators, congresswoman etc. I could be lawfully elected or appointed to political office in which case the OFFICE STATUS has a domicile on federal territory, but the OFFICER does not. This puts me in the "Privileged" category as stated in the first 8, and 1-4 on the bottom.

If this is correct, people born out of the America, can hold high positions to use the law to put u.s. citizens in prisons and whatever F they want. This explains my 4 passport Card.* Because I've always put U.S. citizen, yet I got 4stars without trying!

I also found out-- because I have a 4* passport I do not need a driver's license. But if you're 3 star you would still need one.

This is how foreigners(United States) is doing this. Not being an American, but posing as if they were. Playing both cards! Because they're on a separate "Congressional Privilege" status.

https://m.stacker.news/37716

Also get this: Because I fall into this category, I might be able to get access(limited) to press corps. I think this is how Julian Assange was able to get some leaked documents! I just don't know how. but still interesting. This guy.

https://m.stacker.news/37718

https://www.rcfp.org/journals/the-news-media-and-the-law-spring-2007/congressional-privilege/

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Hamstr 29 Jun

question, can they mail you a summon to a rural free delivery address?

33 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 31 Jul

next #592582

Prefixes and Suffixes

part of: Lux's Pills - A Comprehensive Set of Truths