pull down to refresh

If you wish to support a pool that contributes more to the Bitcoin ecosystem than mining alone, Slush pool is the place to go. They will be renamed Braiins pool as of September. They are one of the driving forces behind Stratumv2 (more decentralized mining) and the Braiins software (tuning miners). Their current share is around 5 - 6%

reply

Blockstream uses Brains pool

reply
Is this a threat to decentralization?

I don't think so. The mining pool operator doesn't have control over the individual miners. If a pool has bad behavior miners can switch to another pool.

I would want to see the distribution of hashrate by decision-making entities, but I don't know how to get that data.

reply

Foundry is the largest and they control all their hashrate. You and I cannot mine for Foundry.

reply

That’s not true. A bunch of publicly traded us miners mine for foundry. Hut 8, I think marathon, etc. they’re enterprise-focused, but they don’t own all their hashrate.

reply

I stand corrected. However, they vet their miners before allowing them to pool. What could they possibly be offering to be so exclusive?

reply

regulatory certainty?

reply

Ah, didn't know that. Is that coz they control all the hardware or because of something else, like a protocol they run?

reply

Do these top 3 miners take possession of the morning equipment and warehouse them (like compass)?

reply

Ideally, mining power wouldn’t be so concentrated but the beauty of Bitcoin is that the miners don’t control the network. The node operators do, and pretty much anyone can run a node. Remember, miners opposed SegWit but they were forced to comply thanks to the nodes.

reply

Every industry has this problem that lead to market concentration. Big pools get smaller costs by miner, thus offering lower fees and then getting more miners. Same with any other industry (eg amazon, nike, walmart, bp, you name it). I guess the only option would be like a p2pool, a protocol level designed pool, with no admin that would offer 0 fees. However it may be harder to implement specific high speed communications between miners to work with coordination. Clearly big pools use their own specific custom made super fast protocols so they save time on gossip, proof sending, block building, etc. IMHO.

reply

We need StratumV2

reply

Not really a threat. StratumV2 will make it even less of a threat.

reply
Is this a threat to decentralization?

Not yet. But if one were to join mining they should join a smaller pool.

reply

10% для каждого пула будет нормой. но тот кто хочет иметь более будет это делать в одиночестве. особенно если это США. и будет вынужден майнить и наращивать сеть своего пула что б пробывать провести атаку. им ещё нужно 100% своей мощности. и только после 51% они могут сделать попытку провести атаку 51%.для сохранения $ как мировой валюты. но спешу вас успокоить. этого не случиться так как есть программа для наращивания сети в такой ситуации. или будет сделан регрес для вечной гонки на пороге 1% который не набрать. 49% так и останется не преодалимой цыфрой. имхо

reply

Safety from 51% attack can't be accomplished by just keeping someone's hash rate below 49% at average (not peak) load. If for example Foundry wants to mount a 51% attack they need to rent 30% more to succeed which is still hard enough for now. But if a single miner controls 49% the safety is already dead because they can just rent 2% more whenever they want.

reply

Not good.

reply

But they aren't in China any more! Lol

reply

Yeah this would only be concerning if three companies owned over 51% of miners. If a pool started mining empty blocks, it wouldn’t be able to pay miners, and they’d switch to a different pool pretty quickly.

reply

deleted by author

reply

I´ve heard that Foundry has very strict KYC & AML-regulations, for all miners participating in Foundry USA.

How can we reduce the mining-ratio of Foundry USA, in addition to get Foundry to plug in to StratumV2?⛏️

reply