pull down to refresh
The courts are properly reclaiming power from administrative agencies.
Is that what it is? Maybe I read the article wrong, I thought they were interpreting laws the way it suits them.
In the US courts have the role of interpreting laws. The Chevron case granted that judicial authority to administrative agencies. This decision corrects that longstanding error, in my opinion.
I realize they have a role in interpreting the law. Even when this error is corrected, what happens when the law is interpreted in a way that isnt right? Im sure it is only a matter of time before that happens. Or maybe I am just paranoid?
@Bell_curve nailed it. Only courts have the power to interpret law.
@Bell_curve = @siggy47 ? OMG haha
omg, not this again lol
I listen to Law Talk podcast with Epstein and Yoo
I also took one semester of Constitutional Law in college
I consider myself an expert, an armchair legal scholar
Federal administrative agencies abused a power they never should have been given in 1984 by Supreme Court, majority opinion written by Stevens
It was only a matter of time. Is the court system starting to make a power grab? They can interpret laws the way they want?