21 sats \ 5 replies \ @BITC0IN 10h \ on: The canon of Satoshi bitcoin
this is the source i got the wei dai emails from,
https://gwern.net/doc/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto
The video reference to "b-money" is wei dai's 1998 blog post on the topic of e-cash. it has nothing to do with bcash or any other shitcoin fork. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bmoney.asp
I don't know how you arrived at the conclusions you did. i don't know where you got the bitcoin.com sourcing from, or why you even mention the other forked shitcoins in this post.
I'm BITCOINALLCAPS
another source for the wei dai emails: https://gwern.net/doc/bitcoin/2014-smithset.pdf
Sunday Times (London, England). (Mar. 2, 2014): News: p16.
bitcoin.com is not the source.
reply
Thanks for this. The bitcoin.com link was the top one that came up in a search for "Wei Dai Satoshi emails". The reason for including other coins was mainly due to the fact that the Wei Dai emails and Matonis emails are not included on NakamotoInstitute.org. The fact that Dai's are on bitcoin.com and that Matonis is a Wright believer may suggest that's why they're not on nakamotoinstitute.org. (If that makes sense!)
reply
reply
the Matonis and wei dai emails should be independently analyzed and not conflated here.
Yep. My hope is that a "source" might get traced back to whenever and wherever those supposed emails originated. For instance, did Wei Dai release those emails in a blog post somewhere? At some point, they got from his email and into the wild. In my mind, this would really help to determine if theyre legit.
I think about the Martti Malmi/Satoshi emails that got released by him on his own github. That's coming from the source itself, not a website that may have an agenda.
reply
read the 2014 article: https://gwern.net/doc/bitcoin/2014-smithset.pdf
(might be worth digging into the archives of the sunday times newspaper to verify/find a copy)
it sounds like the author of that article had access to the emails, and then this gwern character somehow got a copy and posted them.
reply