reply on: The Whipping Boy of Modern Culture - CAPITALISM \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @DarthCoin 26 Sep \ parent \ on: The Whipping Boy of Modern Culture - CAPITALISM bitcoin

There's no point in talking with a statist that do not want to step out of the "comfortable state box" and be responsible for his own actions. As there's no point in talking with shitcoiners.

IT IS WASTING TIME.

btw, just by looking to your history posts on SN and is clear now that is only garbage in your brain. The state infected so much your brain that is non-recoverable.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford OP 26 Sep

Its true. I have little interest in arguing but I get sucked into it.

I'll tell you. If someone is trying to convince me to believe in the state they are wasting their breath. If you want that you can just basically talk to any human on the planet.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

If you have confidence and understanding of your belief then you welcome the contest of ideas- if however your understanding is weak and based more on group joining following herd mentality then you will feel uncomfortable when your ideas are contested and will react negatively.

0 sats \ 9 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

Name calling. You cannot refute the facts and issues I have raised. Issues which expose the weakness of your Libertarian religion. You cover your insecurity with name calling because you cannot respond to and refute the issues I have raised. You lose the contest of ideas by failing to even engage with the ideas resented to you.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 26 Sep

your text sounds like redditGPT

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

You again resort to crude troll response rather than responding to the actual issues raised.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @kepford OP 26 Sep

statist

Is that what you are referring to? Always cracks me up when people consider this a slur. You say we need a state but don't like statist?

Then you call Libertarianism a religion. I assume you mean that as an insult.

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

without the protection of the state you would be in a sorry state yourself. Have you ever lived where the state is truly failed? Go to Somalia or Afghanistan and see how you like it.

157 sats \ 4 replies \ @javier 26 Sep

The state in Somalia and Afghanistan has not failed. What has failed is the population. The state cannot be bigger in those countries, controlling everything including free speech, religion, and property.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

Wrong. You clearly do not understand the system in those countries as they do not have a strong central government- governance is largely managed by district. This is what naturally happens when the central government fails- the role of governance devolves to regional level. Governance is a natural and unavoidable function of ANY organised group of humans.

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @javier 26 Sep

Switzerland has cantons and is subdivided into small regions and has virtually no central government. Furthermore, the state is smaller than the rest of the countries, which is why they are better off.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 26 Sep

Excellent example and yes I agree that is an amazing system- however is it only able to exist because Switzerland has for centuries been the designated neutral 'vault' for Europes warring nations?

It seems like Switzerlands unique and beautiful system is perhaps only viable because they have acted in that role of agreed neutral 'store of value'.

Switzerland is the exception that proves the rule...because Switzeraland has avoided the need to compete militarily with its neighbours, that has saved huge centralised investment and thereby enabled considerable private wealth and freedoms not ordinarily possible in most nation states.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 26 Sep

Its like an anti-anarchy troupe machine!