How would a nation state on The Bitcoin Standard defend itself against a military attack from a nation state (lets say of otherwise identical economic size, population and resources) that uses fiat monetary system? Surely if all other factors were equal the fiat nation state can leverage superior resources (via fiat debasement) and defeat The Bitcoin Standard nation state?

Would individuals consent to the government using their money to finance wars that do not benefit their countrymen if they owned their own money, savings, and spending?

I haven't tried much, but I think framing it in terms of central planning, and how that has been a total disaster every time it's been tried, is a good approach. Don't even mention the words socialist or capitalist if possible.

It's ok, we actually have the exact same phenomenon here, down to every detail you mentioned. The pejorative term here is "leftie with OSDE" (OSDE is THE most expensive high-elite health insurance service in the entire country), "leftie with iphone", "snowflake", "macchiato leftie", etc. It's the exact same pattern.

Yet, while we despise them, they are not a major driving force. The biggest problem is and has always been just sheer ignorance from the general population, in the exact same way the USA has been affected too: republicans have no other distinction from democrats other than conservatism. Milei was the first referent ever to explicitly and vehemently point out that fact, a bold move because it attacked both parts of the electorate, with the intention to create a third one (a move that to many seemed unbearably paradoxical). The fact he did pulled that off against all odds is nothing short of a Napoleonic-level political victory.

The current regimes are supposedly designed to regulate markets and capitalists. If it doesn't work under what we have now what makes one think killing the prices system and central planning will be better. We have mountains of evidence showing socialism leads to shortages and poverty. No thanks.