State cage mindset is a great phrase for it. It is a mental cage for sure.
You fail to respond let alone refute any pf the facts and issues I raise instead replying with your stock in trade of troll name calling. I am here for reasoned debate not name calling- if you cannot respond to the ideas and challenges I have thrown your way with a fact based reasoned and respectful reply then you lose the contest of ideas by default.
reply
There's no point in talking with a statist that do not want to step out of the "comfortable state box" and be responsible for his own actions. As there's no point in talking with shitcoiners.
IT IS WASTING TIME.
btw, just by looking to your history posts on SN and is clear now that is only garbage in your brain. The state infected so much your brain that is non-recoverable.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford OP 17h
Its true. I have little interest in arguing but I get sucked into it.
I'll tell you. If someone is trying to convince me to believe in the state they are wasting their breath. If you want that you can just basically talk to any human on the planet.
reply
If you have confidence and understanding of your belief then you welcome the contest of ideas- if however your understanding is weak and based more on group joining following herd mentality then you will feel uncomfortable when your ideas are contested and will react negatively.
reply
Name calling. You cannot refute the facts and issues I have raised. Issues which expose the weakness of your Libertarian religion. You cover your insecurity with name calling because you cannot respond to and refute the issues I have raised. You lose the contest of ideas by failing to even engage with the ideas resented to you.
reply
your text sounds like redditGPT
reply
You again resort to crude troll response rather than responding to the actual issues raised.
reply
statist
Is that what you are referring to? Always cracks me up when people consider this a slur. You say we need a state but don't like statist?
Then you call Libertarianism a religion. I assume you mean that as an insult.
reply
without the protection of the state you would be in a sorry state yourself. Have you ever lived where the state is truly failed? Go to Somalia or Afghanistan and see how you like it.
reply
157 sats \ 4 replies \ @javier 17h
The state in Somalia and Afghanistan has not failed. What has failed is the population. The state cannot be bigger in those countries, controlling everything including free speech, religion, and property.
reply
Wrong. You clearly do not understand the system in those countries as they do not have a strong central government- governance is largely managed by district. This is what naturally happens when the central government fails- the role of governance devolves to regional level. Governance is a natural and unavoidable function of ANY organised group of humans.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @javier 16h
Switzerland has cantons and is subdivided into small regions and has virtually no central government. Furthermore, the state is smaller than the rest of the countries, which is why they are better off.
Its like an anti-anarchy troupe machine!
reply