The two circles and with radii of 1 are tangent with each other and with the horizontal line at the bottom. Circle is inscribed with a maximum possible radius inside , , and the horizontal line. , ,... are successively inscribed following the same rule maximizing their radius.
Find the diameter of a circle .
Previous iteration: #720410 (quite a few different valid solutions were found for this one, congrats~~)
For O1 looking at the right triangle
Pythagoras says
(1−r)2+12=(1+r)2
which means the diameter of O1 is 21.
This can be repeated of O2 giving 61 and O3 giving 121 etc.
I don't yet have the generic formula for On
Looks good. I'm not sure about your value for O3 though.
For O2
(1−21−r)2+1=1+2∗r+r2
For O3
(1−21−61−r)2+1=1+2∗r+r2
(66−63−61−r)2+1=1+2∗r+r2
(31−r)2+1=1+2∗r+r2
91−32∗r+r2+1=1+2∗r+r2
91−32∗r=2∗r
91=38∗r
9∗83=r
241=r
Diameter is twice that, so 121
No?
That would give diameters 21,61,121,201,301,...
For the sequence of divisors there are multiple candidates
This is a great website. Didn't know about it. Made me check out the infamous https://oeis.org/A000127 sequence, for which there seem to be many more cases showing this unexpected change from 32 to 31.
Aren't you using the same symbol r to denote the different radii of O1 (as in the drawing) and O2 (as in the right-hand side of the formula below)? And same comment for the subsequent O3 equation?
I used a different approach to solve this problem (I'll post it as a solution with the next iteration), but that one gives me 1/18 for O3.
For O3
(the top-left corner of the triangle is supposed to be the center of O)
The hypotenuse is 1 + r, where r denotes the radius of O3.
The horizontal leg is simply 1 (this is true for all On).
The vertical leg is 1 minus the sum of all diameters O1 and O2 minus r of O3.
So, Pythagoras gives r of O3.
Ok got it. This seems correct. I'll have to figure out why my approach is giving a different result. I likely must have applied it incorrectly. Please don't spend more time on this, I'm assuming the error must be on my side at this point.
You're right, I incorrectly applied Descartes. 1/12 is correct. My bad...
Oh, neat, I didn't know about Descartes' theorem!
So you're calculating
where curvature kn is rn1 (the inverse of the radius).
If I pick O, O′ and O1 to calculate O2
Now we can simply repeat with O, O′ and O2 to calculate O3
So radius 241 or diameter 121
And I guess a direct formula for circle On could be
Yes, exactly.
Related to Apollonian gaskets
I'll check my notes tomorrow.