pull down to refresh

Aren't you using the same symbol to denote the different radii of (as in the drawing) and (as in the right-hand side of the formula below)? And same comment for the subsequent equation?
For
For
I used a different approach to solve this problem (I'll post it as a solution with the next iteration), but that one gives me for .
For
(the top-left corner of the triangle is supposed to be the center of )
The hypotenuse is 1 + , where denotes the radius of .
The horizontal leg is simply 1 (this is true for all ).
The vertical leg is minus the sum of all diameters and minus of .
So, Pythagoras gives of .
reply
Ok got it. This seems correct. I'll have to figure out why my approach is giving a different result. I likely must have applied it incorrectly. Please don't spend more time on this, I'm assuming the error must be on my side at this point.
reply
You're right, I incorrectly applied Descartes. 1/12 is correct. My bad...
reply
Oh, neat, I didn't know about Descartes' theorem!
So you're calculating
where curvature is (the inverse of the radius).
If I pick , and to calculate
Now we can simply repeat with , and to calculate
So radius or diameter
reply
And I guess a direct formula for circle could be
reply
Yes, exactly.
a fractal generated by starting with a triple of circles, each tangent to the other two, and successively filling in more circles, each tangent to another three.
reply