pull down to refresh

Aren't you using the same symbol to denote the different radii of (as in the drawing) and (as in the right-hand side of the formula below)? And same comment for the subsequent equation?

For



For

I used a different approach to solve this problem (I'll post it as a solution with the next iteration), but that one gives me for .

For

circles2

(the top-left corner of the triangle is supposed to be the center of )

The hypotenuse is 1 + , where denotes the radius of .

The horizontal leg is simply 1 (this is true for all ).

The vertical leg is minus the sum of all diameters and minus of .

So, Pythagoras gives of .

reply

Ok got it. This seems correct. I'll have to figure out why my approach is giving a different result. I likely must have applied it incorrectly. Please don't spend more time on this, I'm assuming the error must be on my side at this point.

reply

You're right, I incorrectly applied Descartes. 1/12 is correct. My bad...

reply

Oh, neat, I didn't know about Descartes' theorem!

So you're calculating

where curvature is (the inverse of the radius).

If I pick , and to calculate

Now we can simply repeat with , and to calculate

So radius or diameter

reply

And I guess a direct formula for circle could be

reply

Yes, exactly.

Related to Apollonian gaskets

a fractal generated by starting with a triple of circles, each tangent to the other two, and successively filling in more circles, each tangent to another three.
reply