pull down to refresh
406 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Oct 2024 \ parent \ on: Zapping More Might Solve Our Leader Board Wizard Issue meta
I don't think so. A stacker like that would have a low trust score, so their zapping wouldn't move the needle much on posts. Also, zap size is counted logarithmically, so it becomes very expensive to elevate content as a single zapper.
A handful of downzappers could take down such a whale.
Do not underestimate them... there are many here with multiple accounts, playing around.
reply
That's what the 30% sybil fees are for.
reply
If only we could unveil all of them.
I think gaming the system is wrong, but morals are different for each person.
reply
But it also works the same way with downzapping.
If a person has multiple accounts, and then downzaps on the same post, wouldnt that be unfair?
reply
That is a potential problem. I think it matters whether their multiple accounts have high global trust, though.
reply
@k00b, is that true?
Or can any new account just downzap, and that will bring it into an outlaw category?
reply
Undisciplined cares about how it works and knows how it works.
Downzaps are weighted by trust just like zaps.
reply