pull down to refresh

406 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Oct \ parent \ on: Zapping More Might Solve Our Leader Board Wizard Issue meta
I don't think so. A stacker like that would have a low trust score, so their zapping wouldn't move the needle much on posts. Also, zap size is counted logarithmically, so it becomes very expensive to elevate content as a single zapper.
A handful of downzappers could take down such a whale.
write
preview
60 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 18 Oct
Do not underestimate them... there are many here with multiple accounts, playing around.
reply
117 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Oct
That's what the 30% sybil fees are for.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 18 Oct
If only we could unveil all of them. I think gaming the system is wrong, but morals are different for each person.
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 18 Oct
But it also works the same way with downzapping. If a person has multiple accounts, and then downzaps on the same post, wouldnt that be unfair?
reply
30 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Oct
That is a potential problem. I think it matters whether their multiple accounts have high global trust, though.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 18 Oct
@k00b, is that true? Or can any new account just downzap, and that will bring it into an outlaw category?
reply
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Oct
Undisciplined cares about how it works and knows how it works.
Downzaps are weighted by trust just like zaps.
reply