He plays completely into the hands of the narrative that Bitcoin is a speculative commodity, not a p2p payments protocol. This is precisely the narrative that bankers and governments have pushed by obstructing payments via taxes by designating Bitcoin as a commodity. They have introduced KYC and a few carefully selected CEXes who are cosy with the banks to track and trace who holds what. ETFs are acquiring custody of an ever increasingly proportion of the total whereby they and other institutional custodians prevent those sats from being used for p2p payments. This has significant negative liquidity consequences for Bitcoin - strictly limited issuance protocol seeking to provision global scale payments. This also prepares the ground for institutional custodians to have considerable influence on any future hard forks- all ETFs explicitly state they, not the investors who paid for the Bitcoins ETFs hold, will unilaterally decide the response to any hard fork. Watch this and learn more about this threat to the protocol-

Ultimately all of this prepares the ground perfectly for an Order 6102B Do not think the fiat bankers and governments are going to just let their power and wealth be displaced by Bitcoin without a fight. Saylor is a sell out parasite singing to the speculative commodity narrative that the bankers and governments are pushing. He got called out and backtracked but he has shown his true colours and they have been evident for a long time to anyone who has read the white paper and understands the fundamental and primary purpose of Bitcoin is as a decentralised censorship resistant P2P payments protocol- not a rich pricks speculative commodity plaything.