pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @kristapsk 27 Sep 2022 freebie \ parent \ on: Private Bitcoin Core through i2p and tor bitcoin
Then, we get LN implementations to support it (hard).
Problem here is latency. Even Tor sucks in this regard and I2P is even worse. Definitely not suitable for routing nodes.
write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @nullcount 28 Sep 2022
Evidence that I2P has worse latency? My experience has been the opposite.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @OneHungLow 28 Sep 2022
I2P isn’t as anonymous as Tor, but is still a useful tool and we should have that option.
https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullcount 28 Sep 2022
I2P has a smaller anonset because the network has fewer users. I2P has the same potential to be as big as Tor (and equally anonymous). Plus, it does lots of things better than Tor. And more in-line with Bitcoiner's values: less trust, less centralization.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 28 Sep 2022
Personal experience.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mf OP 28 Sep 2022
Not sure if this even makes sense, but did you share enough bandwidth with your router?
reply