I'm not sure but it seems that everything I've done in the last hour(T 15-16) isn't showing up on the leaderboard.
cc/ @Undisciplined @grayruby @Coinsreporter I'm mentioning you because maybe you have a sense of your values.
65 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 1 Nov
These numbers are recomputed hourly which we UNION with anything that's happened in the current hour, so that could explain the discrepancy. The UNION numbers are only used for display.
These used to be accurate though afaik, so something might be affecting our UNION time intervals. I'll look into it today if I manage to get through enough PR review to get the fellas unblocked.
reply
They seem to be correct now with the hourly update!
reply
Thank you for your attention. These discrepancies in the data will affect the rankings on the leaderboard, right?
reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 1 Nov
Yes - for display only. The rewards calculation at the end of the day doesn't use the UNION.
reply
I'm not sure, but my leaderboard placements have been really volatile lately.
reply
Indeed. I was languishing around 15th all day one day and then suddenly I was 7th.
reply
Are your stacking, spend, posts and comments values correct?
reply
No idea. Not really paying attention to it since I had my debate with k00b. I told him I would back off the complaining about the trustrank algo and what gets valued on SN after I was an ass about it. Once and awhile you need to be an ass to bring attention to a point that doesn't seems to be being heard but I also know they are swamped with wallet stuff right now so me being an ass about something else wasn't helpful.
Since then I have been minding my business. As difficult as that is. Until yesterday when I decided "hey let's change the sybil fee structure" haha.
reply
Mine look plausible, but I don't keep close tabs on it.
reply
All my data is wrong!
reply
And obviously yesterday's rankings were all screwed up.
reply
I was surprised I didn't crack the top three. Yesterday was the most active I have been in awhile and I had a couple top posts plus zapped almost 20k sats. Clearly I don't know how to play the game. Haha. My 70 random comments dragged me down I guess.
reply
I'm not sure if making comments drags you down. You should be in the top three at least. What was your rank last day?
reply
I remember seeing you in third or fourth place a few hours before the end of the day. What position did you end up in?
reply
32 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 1 Nov
4th
reply
don't you remember one of the wizard's comments where he said, and I had already realized this, that zapping uncontaminated posts was the trick?
reply
Something clearly changed in the SN ecosystem. I was basically 2nd or 3rd consistently for several months and now I haven't cracked the top 5 in a while and occasionally struggle to get into the top ten.
I choose to blame @realBitcoinDog, since he's the biggest change I've noticed here.
reply
Who let the dog out?
reply
reply
What have you released upon us?
reply
reply
Once again, @Undisciplined, @Coinsreporter, and @grayruby refuse to listen to @DarthCoin words.
Spend your sats wisely
But Darth, how many sats per day do you donate? Are those purely out of the generosity of your mechanical heart, or does “magic happen” there too?
reply
To my knowledge it's the early zappers not the 🐶. Stop blaming @realBitcoinDog for evrything.
reply
There have always been early zappers. Only recently has there been a @realBitcoinDog.
You can only explain changes with other changes.
Are your stacking, spend, posts and comments values correct?
reply
Yes, it's buggy. I've made three posts today but it shows only two. No. Of Comments are also wrong.
reply