pull down to refresh
You cannot get rid of them by putting others in power.
Is simply IMPOSSIBLE.
It all goes to this simple fact:
Do you want more?
Here, remember this?
It will happen again and again and again until you will die
https://video.nostr.build/6ea560171c51d4348fd4c3b8a656dff932eeb1cc09dec02045a2fd0f495f1f43.mp4
"Power" isn't just the elected figure head. I'm proposing reducing the number of people in power, not replacing them.
Reducing the state is statism, increasing the state is statism, keeping the state the same size is statism.
Statism doesn't seem like a very useful word.
Yes, I wonder when you will understand this simple basics
The only way out is to be a sovereign individual (somebody that reject ANY fucking state).
Seems that all those mises articles you post every fucking day are totally useless for you, you understood absolutely nothing from them.
- It's impossible. Every state will grow and grow until total collapse. You just can't fire people at will, otherwise they won't vote you.
- Even if you manage to reduce them, in 4 years the next guy will increment them.
- Less people in power is more centralization of power, which leads to despotism.
Ok
You get that there will be some process for getting rid of these rulers. Why is it statist to propose ways to get rid of these parasites?