I don't know where the referendum is or if there even is one so I am just creating one here.
Long-form content (the stuff you see on habla.news for example) is already editable but this is about edits of
kind:1
events aka short text notes aka the stuff you probably interact with the most on nostr clients like Amethyst, Coracle, Damus, Primal etc.Afaict, there are currently four major proposals for such edits:
- Editable Short Notes
- Add annotations
- nip37: optional kind:1 edits
- nip37: non-harmful editable short notes
However, if I may add my unsolicited opinion: I don't consider 2. to be an option for edits since it only allows to append stuff. So it's more about "additions", not edits (not sure where "annotation" came from). I have expressed my opinion in this Github comment. I know nothing about 3. and 4. which were created recently by @fiatjaf.
If you want to see the arguments of each side, you'll have to read the GH discussions.
btw, Amethyst already supports full edits but they are not interoperable in the sense that you only see the edits in Amethyst if I understood them correctly. I don’t use Amethyst so maybe someone else can confirm.
Yes41.7%
Yes but it depends16.7%
No41.7%
12 votes \ 18h left