24 sats \ 17 replies \ @Undisciplined 7 Nov \ parent \ on: Political Polarization Relatively Strong in the U.S. Politics_And_Law
Why? It seems better for everyone if we just go our separate ways. There's no common ground in how the opposing sides want the country to be governed.
Instead of taking turns winning and losing, both sides could just be governed the way they want.
How do you even go about splitting the usa?
Any ideas?
reply
It's already composed of 50 supposedly sovereign republics. They just each decide if they want to be independent or join a new union with a subset of the other states.
It's a lot easier than people make it seem.
reply
Are they actually sovereign?
I think it is a bit harder than you think, that is why none have made that transition.
reply
None have made the transition, because the last time states tried, their populations were slaughtered by the Feds.
I don't think there's an appetite now to violently suppress state/regional independence like there was 180 years ago.
Opinion polling indicates that regional independence is very popular in every part of the US.
reply
I know texas has talked about it.
And california.
But none of them have moved on it.
reply
There are independence movements all over the country and some states have even voted on it. It's not unthinkable everywhere. People talk about it as a matter of practicality.
reply
Interesting.
Maybr l just dont hear about it because of my state.
Which states are the most likey to break off?
reply
The two you mentioned, CA and TX, because they are the largest economies and make the most geographic sense.
Alaska, Hawaii, and Vermont also have significant independence movements.
In the event of CA or TX splitting off, I would expect other states to join them: i.e. the rest of the West Coast leaving with CA and most of the middle/southern parts of the country leaving with TX.