78 sats \ 13 replies \ @Imyourfed 11 Nov \ on: Best bitcoin only, open source software wallets for teaching beginning bitcoin bitcoin_beginners
Am I the only one who uses Muun Wallet?
I was going to mention it. It's the one I use for most purposes. Excellent wallet, as simple as it gets, and the one I recommend.
The other one I have is Zeus, for it's easier to integrate with SN and Nostr, tough Muun is being listed by Yakihonne for integration now.
reply
Thanks for sharing! I'll try Zeus too!
reply
only idiots use that garbage
reply
I wonder why did you say that! Also, I not only use Muun Wallet, but others like - Wallet of satoshi (for withdrawing small amount of Sats), Proton Wallet (Started using it recently as it is BTC only Wallet and meant to store your BTC for long term),and Binance Wallet(It's my main one).
Also, I find that image very rude :(
reply
start reading, your low level knowledge about BTC wallets is disturbing
https://darth-coin.github.io/wallets/lightning-wallets-comparison-en.html
Also, I find that image very rude :(
I don't fucking care how you find it. truth must hurt.
Proton Wallet (Started using it recently as it is Swiss-based BTC only
So if is a "swiss-based" what does it mean? That's just a stupid reason to choose a wallet based on its "location". Also linking your BTC keys with a public email address is just fucking stupid.
reply
Bro, I'm not being rude here so please stop speaking shit to me!
I know what I'm doing and everything is going really awesome from the day I started investing! I choose Proton wallet because I pay for their email and VPN services (ever heard of ProtonMail? When I said it's a Swiss-based Wallet I clearly mean that not even a single info of your is needed to Receive/send BTC and very few Wallets like these are legal in my country)So, stfu and get yourself a life.
F**ng idiot!
reply
reply
Yeah, I heard Muun isn't really a "lightning wallet" but don't understand the implications of that. You can still send someone a few sats and they can use it like a lightning wallet with the benefit of not having to fund liquidity, which creates a lower threshold for starting a wallet, like Breez
reply
Exactly!
reply
I think they subsidize and batch small payments, so the fees are manageable. Their approach has several benefits, but also a few problems. The most fundamental one would be that as fees increase, the wallet becomes less usable from an economic perspective. The constant swapping between layers just adds up. We saw that earlier this year when fees were super high during the ordinals nonsense. If you had your own lightning channels (with enough liquidity), it wouldn't have affected you at all. But Muun's system become problematic during that period. It's not clear to me whether they can simply tweak and optimize this system or need to fundamentally rethink it. There are some smart people working on it, I'm sure they have a few ideas.
reply