For gravity does vary across the earth, meaning Newtonās apple has a slightly different weight in various other parts of the world and falls at slightly different speeds. Thatās due to a combination of four factors.
First, thereās a latitudinal effect. The earth is not perfectly round: Itās flatter nearer to (and flattest at) the poles and bulges more towards (and most along) the equator.
Secondly, thereās a rotational effect. That difference in gravity between the poles and the equator is only partly due to gravity itself; itās also caused by the fact that the earth spins faster at the equator.
Then thereās an altitudinal effect. Earthās gravitational pull depends on your distance from its center. Gravity diminishes with altitudeābut again, with fairly limited effect. If youāre 16,400 feet (5 km) up a mountain, you weigh 99.84% of what the scales would say at sea level.
Fourth differentiator: the tidal pull of the moon and sun. Although this has visible, repetitive and significant effectsāthe ebb and flow of sea levelsāthe variations this causes in the earthās gravity are very small indeed.
While the first four factors can be compensated for mathematically, itās the local geology which produces random gravity anomalies of the kind mapped here.
Is not over. Even that sometimes makes me mad seeing so many shitcoiners and statists around.
Many think that my goal is to have "followers" like a stupid influencer. I do not want that, I want exactly the opposite. I want people to think controversially about anything related with bitcoin and the state.
All I see is just a bunch of sheeps repeating over and over what media is feeding them and not even take few moments to think or study the bitcoin past.
Many still ignore my guides (when I indicate them several times) and then come back asking the same questions over and over without reading the guides (where they have the answers and clues).
The laziness of people is absolutely unbelievable. Just take the example of many stackers that have no idea about how is to run a LN node or even use 2-3 alternative mobile wallets.
Thatās where I was going. If you are not frustrated. It sometimes feels so. And what motivates you. I wouldnāt do this myself tbh, at least not in my current state of life.
The Anglo-Zanzibar War, fought between the United Kingdom and the Sultanate of Zanzibar on August 27, 1896, holds the record for the shortest war in history. It lasted only 38 minutes.
ZĆ”topek developed his own training methods to give himself an edge.1 Heād run as fast as he could holding his breath, take a few huffs and puffs and then do it all again. It was an extreme version of Buteykoās methods, but ZĆ”topek didnāt call it Voluntary Elimination of Deep Breathing. Nobody did. It would become known as hypoventilation training. Hypo, which comes from the Greek for āunderā (as in hypodermic needle), is the opposite of hyper, meaning āover.ā The concept of hypoventilation training was to breathe less. Over the years, ZĆ”topekās approach was widely derided and mocked, but he ignored the critics.2 At the 1952 Olympics, he won gold in the 5,000 and 10,000 meters. On the heels of his success, he decided to compete in the marathon, an event he had neither trained for nor run in his life. He won gold. ZĆ”topek would claim 18 world records, four Olympic golds and a silver over his career. He would later be named the āGreatest Runner of All Timeā by Runnerās World magazine.3 āHe does everything wrong but win,ā said Larry Snyder, a track coach at Ohio State at the time.
Source: "Breath: Improve your health and wellbeing by discovering the lost art of breathing" by James Nestor
Colors are an illusion created by our brains to help us make sense of the world around us.
Colors are not properties of objects themselves but are created by our brains. When light hits an object, it reflects certain wavelengths. Our eyes detect these wavelengths and send signals to our brain, which interprets them as colors. So, what we perceive as "red" or "blue" is actually our brain's way of interpreting different wavelengths of light. If we take an example from nature, you may wonder why deer seem so stupid that they can't see a tiger hiding in the grass. But in reality, their eyes perceive just normal shades of green, and the tiger's stripes blend in perfectly, making it much harder for them to spot.
I'm struggling to grasp your conclusion that colors are nonexistent. It would be more precise to say that color perception is contingent upon the presence of light.
If color perception were absent, visual experience would be limited to variations in brightness, resulting in shades of gray, ranging from black to white.
Newton's Apples (and Your) weight is more in Illinois than in Indiana
Footnotes