pull down to refresh
32 sats \ 15 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec \ on: Bitcoin Value Drives SN Inflation And Trust-Score Difficulty meta
I don't know what you're trying to say. What do you mean by inflation? What do you mean by trust-score difficulty?
The trust system has only had two hasty iterations and hasn't been touched in well over a year and rewards, which I suspect you're using as a proxy, haven't been touched since we butchered them in March for MSM.
..., which I suspect you're using as a proxy, ...
I'm a little lost here. Can you break it down for me?
reply
What I mean is that with the increase in Bitcoin's value, it's normal for stackers to zap less frequently. Doesn't this make it harder to improve the stackers' trust score? I don't have data on zaps, but I think it doesn't even matter because it's just an adjustment mechanism. Regarding inflation, I'm specifically referring to the prices for posting and commenting. I know Siggy lowered the price in his territories, but in others, the value is low.
reply
Trust is a distribution, ie assigned relative to other stackers, so it isn't effected by price.
Posting costs will likely remain high until we lower territory prices which I plan to do but need to finish some other work first. Is 1 sat for commenting prohibitively expensive?
reply
I interpreted the question as: with higher bitcoin price, is the average daily amount of zaps lower?
(And is that somehow affecting the rankings, which I guess it wouldn't if it's proportional across all the stackers ' lower zapping behaviour)
reply
Yeah, I believe the idea is that trust is based on zapping the same things as other stackers, so if zapping becomes less frequent, then trust scores will grow more slowly.
reply
in fairness I did mean zap value but thinking about your answer, what you say makes sense.
reply
Ok, you should have meant what I thought you meant. I recall k00b saying that zap size doesn't factor into trust scores.
reply
reply
reply
I'm planning to increase the
once
price while decreasing monthly
and yearly
. The once
founders mostly end up squatting on their territories ... so we either increase or remove the option (if we do remove it, current once
founders will be grandfathered).For monthly and yearly, whenever I make the switch I will prorate a refund.
so it isn't effected by price.
and zap value ?
Is 1 sat for commenting prohibitively expensive?
of course not. I was thinking more about post cost in some territories and especially rent territories price.