pull down to refresh

Don't try to slander me... and interpreting my answers in the wrong way. I know you hate me but this is not good what you are trying to do here. Included in a block it doesn't means is "confirmed".
reply
33 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 8h
I am giving you a chance to clarify what you are talking about since the way you reply to @0xbitcoiner makes us believe you think we can use RBF to create a chain split which is simply not true.
@0xbitcoiner: I am a bit lost. Isn't RBF just for transactions waiting to be confirmed (mempool)? It doesn't work after the transaction is in a block, right?
@DarthCoin: If the RBF have a higher fee and a miner willing to take, it will replace the previous one.
reply
I didn't said you can create a chain split. I only said that you can use RBF on a tx that already have 1 confirmation (as OP asked). Chain split is another story.
Again you are trying to twist my words.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
For it to work like you're saying, a chain split has to happen
reply
I am just pointing into the direction to read more about and test. Did you test yourself a double spending?
reply
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 16 replies \ @ek 8h
With only one confirmation there is some chance that the block with the confirmation will get orphaned
Yes, but this has nothing to do with RBF.
In this case, your transaction will become unconfirmed again. It can re-enter the mempool. And RBF can come into play again.
Yes, RBF can only replace unconfirmed transactions. If it has only one confirmation, using RBF will not guarantee a double-spend, you would have to also hope for an orphaned block completely unrelated to RBF in which case it's unconfirmed again so RBF can work again.
reply
When a tx is really "confirmed"?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
After 6 confirmations
reply
And did I said otherwise? I said literally: after 6 confirmations RBF is totally useless. #814121
reply
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek 8h
This explanation is fine to me, but @DarthCoin didn't explain it this way. He just said "you can use RBF on confirmed transactions" which is wrong if you don't include the assumptions. He even linked the BIP which literally mentions it only works on unconfirmed tx instead of explaining himself better.
reply
We got 1 confirmation
"unconfirmed" means BEFORE being included in 6 blocks "confirmed" means included in 6 blocks
reply
33 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 8h
I see what we're disagreeing on now:
"unconfirmed" means it's not included in any block at all "confirmed" means it was included in 6 blocks
Anything in between 1 and 6 blocks is neither confirmed nor unconfirmed.
If a tx has one confirmation, I would say it has one confirmation but it's not confirmed yet.
reply
111 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 7h
I think we wrongful use this term "confirmation". A tx really is never "confirmed", it is just included in 1 block or 1000 blocks. We only agree that after 6 blocks all wallet apps will not let the user to do a RBF anymore, therefore, we consider it "confirmed".
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 7h
I think we wrongful use this term "confirmation".
I can agree with that, let's keep it at that.
I see what you're saying now and it makes sense but the way you're saying it is extremely confusing, especially for noobs.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 8h
Yeah, the RBF'ed tx got 1 confirmation after it was mined but both were sitting in the mempool prior to that. Nothing special about a tx having one confirmation. This is the picture before your picture:
reply
I do not understand why did you moved the discussion from OP to Saloon. OP asked: Why isn't one confirmation enough for a bitcoin transaction? So my answer is: because only after 6 blocks a tx can be considered "confirmed". Until then you can use RBF.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 7h
So my answer is: because only after 6 blocks a tx can be considered "confirmed". Until then you can use RBF.
So this is what you teach noobs? So if a noob does RBF on a tx with 5 confirmations and it didn't work, what are you going to say to them why it didn't work?