pull down to refresh

I feel like there is a lot of context missing. I see no difference between https://pro.boltz.exchange and https://boltz.exchange.

reply

The first one is the beta version, which includes the new function for you to provide (paid) liquidity to help Boltz keep with all the swaps they are providing.

As someone said on another of the several SN posts about this very same news, it's a big deal. :-)

reply
which includes the new function for you to provide (paid) liquidity

I don't see this function

edit: Ohh, I just read #830144 and I see that the negative fee for swap-ins 👀

So if I send 1m sats onchain to boltz, I would receive 1m sats + 594 sats on lightning. Mhh, interesting, but that doesn't include the mining fee. But if I would send them 24m, I would earn 37.5k sats:

But I don't have so much inbound liquidity myself lol

reply

Yes, sorry I wasn't more explicit on my answer. The mining fee is included as the "Network fee", I believe. Look how it changes when you use RootStock or Liquid instead of on chain.

It's such a great news. You can use Boltz to rebalance your LN channels, for example, while earning a few sats.

reply

I wouldn't try the beta with such a high amount. :-)

I've provided liquidity for a couple of exchange pairs on RootStock for fun (very small amounts) but the way Boltz has come with (the negative fees) is so clever and simple, and there is no need for you to lock any value. It's genius!

reply

Negative!

reply

when something seems to be "free sats" it means fishy...

you will remember my words

reply

Can you give me the TLDR on that?

reply

deleted by author

reply

Thanks.

reply

Good thoughts

reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @ama OP 3 Jan

Boltz Pro fees are negative again!

https://pro.boltz.exchange/

Take advantage of it to re-balance your channels or to just make some swaps you want to make whenever is more convenient fees wise.

reply

Congrats to the boltz team. Using incentives to attack their liquidity issue

reply

25 million maximum

reply

Should be higher.

reply