pull down to refresh
51 sats \ 9 replies \ @Natalia 2 Jan \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
Going to be FUN:) Will see how things play out, but then stackers don't really need to run a self-custody LN node for SN.
I wonder why is named "p2p zaps" if most of the people are using other custodial accounts for SN zaps anyways...
reply
reply
so why not lead a fedimint federation on SN? private and decentralized tips with zero shitcoinery, all under your maximalist empire ⚡👑
reply
You are getting it wrong. CCs are not shitcoins. Are simply credits to use SN. Like WoW gold. That's all.
Why to complicate things with a crap fedi when stackers can just use CCs for pay to post?
Fedi doesn't solve anything in SN case. Just complicate it more.
reply
nah, you misunderstood my point, or I explained myself wrong, not talking about CCs as shitcoins, of course not. i'm talking about shitcoinery content in some posts here ;)
reply
that will be the "side effect" 😂
reply
A system like SN is not meant to use this kind of "LN zap interceptor". Too much friction for so many small zaps. People have a wrong idea about "streaming sats"... But soon they will find out.
This will have an impact in:
- how many times stackers will zap. Will be less and less. You will prefer to do a single bigger zap, one time than 10 small zaps.
- the amount they will zap. Bigger zaps will be only when is really worth it, bounties, boosts etc.
The whole era of 1-2-3-10-20 sats even everything under 500-1000 sats will be over because are not worth it.
That's why I will remain a "cowboy credits" maxi and not involve any of nodes into this "p2p zaps". For me SN remain a "pay to post". So if I remain without CCs I will just deposit more sats and use them to pay to post.
reply