pull down to refresh
41 sats \ 10 replies \ @ek 3 Jan \ on: Apple to pay $95 million to settle claims it used Siri to eavesdrop on customers security
Violating your customers' privacy is simply low risk and high reward—essentially a no-brainer.
Btw, let me guess, you posted this in ~security because ~privacy was too expensive. I don't mind, just find it interesting. I would have done the same in your position 👀
Yes. You are exactly right. It's not the first time I avoided those 600 sats, either. I guess I'm a cheapskate.
reply
Who isn’t a cheapskate when it involves hard-to-earn sats? I am not a BTC innovator, so I don’t own even a quarter BTC.
reply
reply
I don't know the exact details, but I do know you need an attached wallet.
reply
reply
I think you have to zap a lot for the gun, and post a lot for the horse, but I could be mistaken.
reply
Is there any good reason to throw good sats down the drain? Whoever is running ~privacy is asking everyone to go elsewhere, as long as there is competition. Perhaps the territory owner needs to reflect a bit upon economics.
reply
Can we create privacy_cheap? :P
reply
reply
Sure you could, but you might not think it's cheap- you can found the territory for 50k sats per month.
reply