I don't want Cowboy Credits \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

854 sats \ 82 comments \ @987654321 4 Jan bitcoin

Yesterday and today I've gotten cowboy credits.

I don't want them. They might as well be likes. I'm going to take a break and see what happens. I'll watch and see before I leave the ranch.

NOSTR is now beating Stacker News.

Except now NOSTR has LLM bots responding.

I'll block and expose those.

I've given myself to Monday to evaluate what is going on here and then I'll decide to stay or leave. I won't be missed. I may return in a month like I did when the rewards were consolidated to longer periods.

My cat said for me not to waste anymore time and to feed her.

view all related items

182 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 4 Jan

One thing I would say is while CC are not ideal you can use them to pay for your posts while everyone finishes up connecting wallets for p2p. Essentially in my mind I'm stacking some free posts and comments

335 sats \ 18 replies \ @OT 4 Jan

It's pretty easy to connect another LN wallet. Try coinos.io with NWC. hould only take a few minutes

68 sats \ 8 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

I 2nd this. CoinOS can be setup with out KYC or even email address.

Whole process can take less than a minute.

52 sats \ 6 replies \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

i have both set up, i just zapped you 10 sats and it defaulted to CC, even though i have nwc enabled , so not sure

32 sats \ 4 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

I had same thing happen when I zapped you 15 sats now.

I wonder if SN thinks (the code doesn't reconginse) we don't have attached wallets for some reason.

#835465

For everything, SN prioritizes using cowboy credits. The one exception is when both the sender AND receiver of a zap have wallets attached.

11 sats \ 1 reply \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

that's so weird, i have had WoS attached for ages and do get zaps from here regularly, so i know it's working.

and yet i was also sent a CC

but reading the post below, and seeing the fee message, does this just mean that doing little zaps of 10 etc is simply too small an amount?

if so, is there any way we can change it, or will i have to mentally adjust to a new, more terrifying zap threshold?

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 Jan

In your settings, you can control these dust limits for yourself. If the sender wants to send you CCs though, you'll receive CCs regardless of these settings.

117 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 4 Jan

Anything in the wallet logs?

135 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

Yes, That is first place I checked.

Initially there was no log records so I decide to submit my reply above.

But now there is a log record:

[lnAddr] ERROR invalid invoice: Estimated fees are too high (1073 > 330)

My apologies, everything makes sense to me now.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 4 Jan

@adam_coinos_io

or email coinos support

or ask their telegram group

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

See above screen shot. I'm already up and running. I've had this for over a month.

10 sats \ 7 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

I've already had this working a month ago. Still it works today.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

once most users actually take the 3 seconds to set up a funding wallet like coinos, we'll all be p2p zapping, and you wont be getting CC. just give it a minute.

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @OT 4 Jan

Drag NWC into the first position. It should stop CC.

98 sats \ 0 replies \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

you cant stop CC if the zaper doesn't have a funding wallet set up

33 sats \ 1 reply \ @oliverweiss 4 Jan

How will this stop CC? As far as I understand, to receive or send sats for zaps both peers need to have external wallets. Stacker with CCs only can zap CC only.

33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 4 Jan

you are right

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

There's no dragging that I can do. I can look at the desktop and investigate. Thank you for trying to help.

I really need to feed my cat.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @astro_penguin 4 Jan

Tap the one you want to move and then tap where you want it.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Skipper 4 Jan

this

108 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 4 Jan

Feed your cat

16 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 4 Jan

A lot of the time my cat meows a ton and then, when I feed her, runs away from her food, like, sprints away from it. I'm like, wtf are you thinking? Truly a foreign intelligence at work.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 4 Jan

Mine also haha

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 4 Jan

I will buy cowboy credits from you with real sats

152 sats \ 1 reply \ @flat24 4 Jan

If you still don't understand why (Cc) are necessary at the business level in SN. instead of continuing to manage the

. then it's probably best to step aside and dedicate yourself to caring for and feeding your Cat. 🐱 you're just not looking at this (Cc) issue from the right perspective.

I invite you to reevaluate the situation so that you understand it, and if at the end of the day you don't understand it. you can always go back to Facebook or other similar places, where we've always been and without really getting anything.

Here at SN you get value from different fronts, in knowledge, in information resources, in "authentic" experiences (although there's always the Assmillker, telling lies to get some SATS) and finally ***(SATS)***⚡ real value, capable of supplying a need in the real world... and possibly some other that I'm missing.

SN is certainly a well-structured community designed for Win Win.

The dynamics of the (Cc) will only make the VxV flow better in

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

I can say nothing and and you can assume it all works. 🍆

40 sats \ 3 replies \ @030e0dca83 4 Jan

If you're here only because of rewards, I have nothing to say to you

So long

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

What part of "Stacker" do you not understand? Or is your own illiteracy as well as innumeracy part off your proletariat charm?

Cowboy Credits are like Fiat without any denominator so they are not scarce. Bitcoin is scarce. There are 2.1 quadrillion sats in the on chain protocol and only 5% are circulating in the zaps and boosts we do. The original premise of Stacker News was to earn sats for reading and posting. It has changed only because of the fear of getting rekt by financial regulators who want to regulate something they don't use or understand and that's the funny part.

I followed the procedure and I went through great lengths to make sure I have a 24 / 7 lightning node running. I don't want some shitcoin.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @030e0dca83 4 Jan

Don't make me laugh. After reading this your "novel" I got you have no clue what the real purpose of stackerNews.

It's a community of soulmates you still haven't become a part of

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 5 Jan

Whether we like it or not, regulars matter, that's why now they don't handle SATS and everything is done in a P2P. way. That's the first part we need to understand. Also SN has never been a site to earn SATS for posting or commenting on memes. The main focus is Spending.

because in life, to receive, you must first give.

Here you pay to post your content or your opinions. without restriction and with a focus on learning and the day-to-day experiences of a Bitcoiner.

regardless of whether you're one of those who mine from the Genesis block or if you're just a newcomer.

The issue of earning SATS comes next. In secondary, and it remains more relevant than ever with the new update. If you provide value to others with your content or opinions. or your memes or whatever, in the end it doesn't matter if it's something that doesn't make sense to someone else. As long as another stacker likes it, you may receive a counter value in (SATS)

the option exists.

In the end, like almost everything in life, the perspective from which you look at this issue will help you or not to understand, learn and take advantage of the opportunity that participating in SN represents.

182 sats \ 4 replies \ @bief57 4 Jan

#836480

Here we see something similar to the real world, good money and bad money... obviously we can use the bad money (Cc) for expenses and small things, but we will look for storage priority for the good money (SATS).

In the case of SN, use your (Cc) for your comments, publication fees and some generic Zap. and the ***(SATS)***⚡ you will use them when something or someone really brings you value. and you will receive them when your work or comments bring value to another. and this other person makes you a real Zap ⚡. And at the company level, SN no longer handles third-party funds. Only some (Cc) that are something fictitious that only has value within the platform. At the regulatory level, they will no longer bother you for using bitcoin. Here, Bitcoin will circulate between individuals in a P2P way without the intervention or management of SN.

And on the other hand, I think that the use of (Cc) is good, because that will scare away the Assmillkers who only come here to collect SATS. without any real contribution.

I think that with this update we will now see more clearly the Philosophy of VxV

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @030e0dca83 4 Jan

The best description I've ever read about cowboy credits

1 sat \ 2 replies \ @bief57 4 Jan

Yesterday I was feeling a little out of place and lost with this change, but @flat24 me this explanation and I really liked it, it got me back on track.

54 sats \ 1 reply \ @030e0dca83 4 Jan

We live only one day with this update and people already cry about it. Imo it'll be improved over time and eventually attract more stackers over here. Sats are scarce and I'm not ready to share it with freeloaders I'd like to zap quality content

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 4 Jan

Sats are scarce and I'm not ready to share it with freeloaders I'd like to zap quality content

I totally agree with you and your thoughts 💭 🤝🤠

194 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 4 Jan

No time like the present to be a big boy and run a node and set up a channel, nostr wallet connect is yoru friend

51 sats \ 8 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

One small suggestion:

Set "receive credits for zaps and deposits below" in settings to 1 sat.

I think it defaults to 10 sats.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

The language in the settings differs from your above description. Either way it's confusing.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

Right above it I have the "receive credits for zaps and deposits below"

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Skipper 4 Jan

how does that options work? if i set it to 1 and you send me a zap of 10 they auto convert to sats?

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Wumbo 4 Jan

The way I interpret it (I could be wrong) is that you will receive credits for zaps below the amount. So setting it low should make receiving Sats more likely. I could be confused, if so someone more knowledgeable will correct me.

Also I changed my "send credits for zaps below" to 5 Sats which is below my default zap amount. To make sure I am sending Sats instead of Credits when zapping.

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 4 Jan

So setting it low should make receiving Sats more likely.

This setting is only for telling us at which amount we should even attempt to try your wallet. You should set it to the amount you can withdraw to your wallet. For example, if you know we won't find a route for less than 10 sats, set it to 10 sats. It does not make sats more likely if it's already low enough. It will just result in more failed zaps on our side which will result in CCs for you anyway.

To make sure I am sending Sats instead of Credits when zapping.

This is the same setting as above just for the sending side

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Skipper 4 Jan

i suggest adding a tooltip with your explanation, to both options 😊

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 4 Jan

good idea

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Skipper 4 Jan

deleted by author

147 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 4 Jan

Did you attach a wallet so you can still send and receive sats?

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 4 Jan

childless cat lady?

12 sats \ 0 replies \ @mod 22h freebie

🚩 This post might be more relevant and engaging in the ~meta territory.

22 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Jan

130 sats \ 1 reply \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 4 Jan

😂😂😂

1 sat \ 1 reply \ @Msd0457890 4 Jan

I still don't quite understand this credit thing, but I'll keep working on SN because I think it's been part of my growth in the Bitcoin rabbit hole.

19 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 4 Jan

Excellent, keep working, complaints should be left for the WhatsApp, Facebook or Telegram groups. In SN we mainly come to participate and learn, the SATS are an added value. that flow with the VxV

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @B_rian 4 Jan

Minibits is a Cashu based custodial wallet I use for Stacker News.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @SwapMarket 4 Jan

Yeah, I don't get it either. I spent time arranging a non-custodial wallet, but now get CCs that I can't withdraw.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 4 Jan

When are sats and when are credits used for zaps?

If the sender and receiver both have wallets attached, the zap exceeds both of their dust limits, and we can predict a successful route with a reasonable fee, the zap prioritizes using the attached wallets and real sats. If either the sender or receiver don't have wallets attached, the zap is below either of their dust limits, or the route to the receiver is too expensive, the zap prioritizes using credits.

— #835465

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Heisenbergbitcoin 4 Jan

Is it possible for me to choose which one to be sent when I zap ? Also what is a dust limit ?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SwapMarket 4 Jan

yeah, yeah, read the small print. "we can change terms and conditions at any time without your approval" bla bla bla

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @electrickmoney 4 Jan

Can someone please explain WTH is a cowboy hat??

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs 4 Jan

Ever thought of adding an extern wallet? It's as simple as downloading WoS, copy-paste the given address, add it to SN and bam: Sats.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

I've already done this. I have Alby and Alby Hub. I've set up two off ramps and two funding ramps.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Akg10s3 4 Jan

From what I've read... there are discrepancies or different opinions... especially when they say that they should remove the rewards🤔.. And I think they should make it simple so that everyone can give value to what they value... and that's it!!

I'm going to keep reading in order to understand better.. But so far those cowboy credits...

They seem unnecessary to me..

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 4 Jan

#836480

With this you should understand it...🤝🤠

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LowK3y19 4 Jan

I just want sats how do I get to Nostr?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @stack_harder 4 Jan

use an app like primal, but there's fuck all zaps on nostr

0 sats \ 16 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

I saw your profile; you're here from 2023? Just leaving because they changed something? This doesn't sound good. You were here only for the Sats?

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

I've spent more than I've earned. I'm here for the SATs only and not Chickie Cheese or Put Put tokens. If I'm spending sats and they are returned as tokens I'm just stupid.

0 sats \ 10 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

This really spins me up,

You were here only for the Sats?

What part of "Stacker" in Stacker News do you not understand?

Stacking sats is whole premise of Stacker News. We came here because we were in Hacker News, Slashdot and thousands of other bulletin boards. We wrote and we shared informing. Here we get to stack sats if our content or participation is good.

The cowboy credits are part of the dumbing down and equalizing Marxist nonsense we have already succumb to in western civilization. Dumb down the participants so that more dumbasses can join and pay to play.

It's already being done and to be honest my PetSmart points are more valuable than Communism Credits because I really need to feed my cat.

22 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 4 Jan

The cowboy credits are part of the dumbing down and equalizing Marxist nonsense we have already succumb to in western civilization. Dumb down the participants so that more dumbasses can join and pay to play.

I don't think you understand why we introduced CCs

But I am probably talking to a brick wall that is already convinced everything is about Marxism

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

Hey, @ek, is there a way to get notifications only when someone replies to me directly? Whenever I start a comment thread, I get notifications for all replies, even if they’re not directed at me. Is there an option for this?

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Jan

If you disable "someone replies to someone who replied to me" in your settings, you should only get notifications for direct replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

Ah! It was right there. Thanks, I’ve disabled it.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aardvark 4 Jan

I know why you guys said you were doing it, but I'm pretty sure it was actually the Marxist thing he was talking about.

Cow boy credit = CC CC = Communist China

Coincidence? 🤔

(Joking if not obvious)

11 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Jan

but I'm pretty sure it was actually the Marxist thing he was talking about

then nothing to discuss for me here, have a good day

11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 4 Jan

Edited to add i was joking

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 4 Jan

What part of "Stacker" in Stacker News do you not understand?

You still stack, but Cowboy Credits, yeehaw 🤠💪

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 4 Jan

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift 4 Jan

You should read my comment again. I mentioned they’re leaving Stacker.news because of the new feature. Where exactly did I troll this user? Hey, @OgFOMK, I didn’t troll you. I simply asked a question about you leaving after being here for a long time just because they introduced CCs, to which you replied with your perspective. That’s all I meant. Thanks.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @987654321 OP 4 Jan

I had another profile and I retired it. This was the most active. Maybe I had a third, too. I've definitely written plenty here and not just ass milking. Notice I wrote "not just assmilking."