pull down to refresh

51 sats \ 13 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Jan \ on: SN feature request: Can we have an option to edit posts and comments later on? devs

@siggy47 has probably been the main proponent of permanently editable posts.

It comes up for discussion every so often. A lot of cool features took a backseat to all the wallet stuff.

write
preview
34 sats \ 12 replies \ @NovaRift OP 9 Jan
A lot of cool features took a backseat to all the wallet stuff.

Thanks. I’m looking forward to some cool features! What cool feature do you think should be added?

reply
51 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Jan

Off the top of my head:

  • shared territory ownership
  • sub-territories
  • custom reply fees
  • series post type
  • cross-posting
  • territory specific rewards systems
reply
21 sats \ 9 replies \ @NovaRift OP 9 Jan

Wow, I like the idea of sub-territories and shared territory ownership. But what do you mean by custom reply fees? Is it the reply we make to someone's post or comment? It's 1 sat or CC; do you want to pay more for it, or is it something else?

Hoping @k00b and @ek notice your comment! 🤞

reply
39 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 9 Jan

Off the top of my head:

  • paying for mentioning people

😅 Anyway, most of these are planned, "custom reply fees" has already been implemented in a PR but hasn't been merged yet.

reply
183 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 9 Jan
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift OP 9 Jan

Off the top of my head:

Paying to access Stacker News after hitting a limit of 10 times a day.

Hold on @k00b, some people aren't made of money here 😂.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Jan

I forgot about paying to mention people (not surprised you didn't, though, @k00b). Yes, that's another cool idea.

reply
22 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Jan

Yeah, the idea is that either the territory or the OP can set the price of replying to posts/comments.

I do think it should be higher, but that's not the point. The point is that it should be something we can alter. When I found Stacker News, posts were only 1 sat and changing it was a big deal, but it's been a massively positive change.

reply
29 sats \ 2 replies \ @sox 9 Jan

I personally think that a territory owner being able to change the comment fee is already a game changer as-is. I fear that if OPs too were able to do that, it could become abusive really quick

reply
32 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 9 Jan

One of the purposes is spam management and the OP is the one getting notified whenever someone responds.

reply
26 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 9 Jan

I see it clearly now, thanks! Maybe something with a range (settable by territory owner) to stop them from creating zombie posts

reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @NovaRift OP 9 Jan

Understood! Thank you.

reply
24 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 9 Jan

I'm a big fan of all of these, though my #1 and #2 would be series posts and crossposting

reply