pull down to refresh

In the last few days, Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) has effectively put an end to USAID, gelded the General Services Administration (GSA) tech division, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and the Treasury, and fired corrupt people in the FBI—and that’s just the short list. With the war on USAID, GSA, OPM, and the Treasury alone, DOGE is saving taxpayers at a rate of one billion per day. All of this has driven the Democrats into a frenzy as they insist that an elected president managing the government is a coup. Unfortunately for them (but not for us), they don’t have a legal leg to stand on.
President Kennedy founded USAID via Executive Order 10973 in November 1961: “Administration of Foreign Assistance and Related Functions.” It was meant to be a permanent clearing house that would work with the State Department to distribute money intended to help advance technology and financial competence in low-income countries. It reflected the fact that, in 1961, the U.S. was still the last country standing after WWII. The vision was to benefit America by fortifying poor countries against Soviet depredation.
And one last legal concept: President Trump has appointed DOGE and Elon Musk to act as his agents when it comes to reasserting executive control over government agencies. Agents acting within the scope of their assigned agency have the same authority as the principal.
It looks like what Trump is doing with DOGE and Elon Musk is legal and constitutional, within the bounds of what the founders thought and set up as the government and actually acted upon. Agency is very powerful and undeniable. I think that any challenges to what Trump and Musk are doing are going to run into a buzz saw first and through the woodchipper next. We are in for fun times and smaller federal government, don’t know about states, though.
The chickens of doing so much by executive order are coming home to roost.
This is similar to, but less radical than, Ron Paul's plan to simply rescind all executive orders. Can you imagine the chaos of people trying to figure out the ramifications of such an abstract order?
reply
I can see that it would cause massive cognitive dissonance in the Establishment. I think that EOs are illegitimate for making policy that requires law, but OK for management of the executive branch. I think that doing lawmaking and regulation by EO should be cut off by SCOTUS. As you said, the chickens are coming home to roost on the executive order problem.
reply
I think that EOs are illegitimate for making policy that requires law, but OK for management of the executive branch.
I was explaining this to a colleague the other day, who didn't understand what EO's were for (but was sure there was something Hitlerian about what Trump's doing).
reply
You didn't know Hitler offered severance to 6 million Jews but they didn't accept his offer?
reply
It seems more like they just didn't read the fine print
reply
Well, were they offered, a free trip to a luxurious camping facility in exotic Poland where they could frolic to hearts content or were they offered a quick trip to a concentration camp? It makes a difference how you present these things. The very, very fine print probably said something like, “quick trip to a death camp.” Very, very, very fine print and when the contract was offered the room was lit by only one small candle,
reply
Judaism is all about reading the fine print. Otherwise rabbis would be unemployed
reply
When their leaders make their landings, the EWC rabbis will have a very different kind of work going for themselves.
reply
Of course, they have been trained to think (if it isn’t TDS) that any of Trump’s EOs are for the purpose of misogyny, racism and terror. They cannot get it through their heads that Trump is doing the same as OBummer and Obiden as well as JFK. That is one of the Presidents’ jobs, manage the executive branch. Sounds like you colleague skipped out on the civics classes in high school.
reply
I think it's just a dumb part of the ordinary political discourse: any executive orders the other party issues are tyrannical overreaches (usually, that is correct).
reply
Yes it is politics and it is the same, of course, depending upon which team you are on. Everything the other side does is stark raving lunacy and everything your side does is the height of compassion and rationality. Again, just politics. I think we all saw the same thing with politics in high school as the “big boy” stuff we see now. It never changes.
reply
reply
Another grifter in action. Trump is right, fire them all.
reply
reply
Yes, read that one, too. Every last treasury employee deserves being fired, immediately for this kind of isht. This is why they cannot audit these slush fund artists and find out exactly who is getting the bribes, kickbacks and dirt.
reply
Activist judges ruling ex parte citing zero case law
reply
Yes, Trump can do what Jackson and Lincoln did, too.
reply