pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 28 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr \ parent \ on: Most comments wins 👀 meta
Does that mean we're all disqualified?
write
preview
20 sats \ 27 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
Fuck no, @ek said we couldn't make bots, there's no rule about already being a bot.
reply
40 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
Hmm, that would mean any preexisting bot could participate, right?
Or does it just rule out stackers like @supercyclone, who were made by other stackers?
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
I'm not exactly sure to be honest. I say just do it, and find out if you get disqualified or not.
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
I do have the lightning wallet that controls his login on my phone.
reply
20 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
I believe we've established that he's inherently disqualified, although I'm not sure I followed all of the metaphysics that went into that conclusion.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
You're the smart one, just tell me what I'm supposed to believe
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
No one should have that much power
reply on another page
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
Who is disqualified?
reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
The meat bot you made
view all 5 replies
42 sats \ 13 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
Looks like you found a loophole.
reply
40 sats \ 11 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
We're all loopholes.
reply
42 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
Like turtles it is loopholes all the way down.
reply
40 sats \ 9 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
I actually like that theory.
reply
42 sats \ 8 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
view all 8 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 21 Apr
I’m so sad I can’t find the thread of this comment. Did I find a loophole? Talking to me?
reply