reply on: bitcointalk.. are you serious?? \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @OT 4 May \ on: bitcointalk.. are you serious?? bitcoin

This has been there for years. I guess no one is maintaining it.

The only project that hasn't moved off bitcointalk is Electrum. Kinda annoying

5 sats \ 6 replies \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 4 May

Are they against LN? don’t understand. 49 sats on-chain doesn’t look appropriate.

55 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 4 May

I think it's been like that from before LN.

Maybe try with a different VPN location?

80 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

Is not about the IP/VPN use. Is about what they said in that message.
Anybody will be willing to pay a small fee, that's not a problem.
The problem is why in the hell they said to send 49 sats to an onchain address. that is literally burning sats.

24 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 May

I've noticed a lot of folks from that era aren't interested in lightning at all.

3 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

appropriate.

not the right word. It is dumb and misleading.

3 sats \ 1 reply \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 4 May

What would be the right word?

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

dumb, idiotic, misleading

5 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

one thing is not maintained and another thing is to put misleading and wrong information messages about Bitcoin for new users.