pull down to refresh

5 sats \ 6 replies \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 11h \ parent \ on: bitcointalk.. are you serious?? bitcoin
Are they against LN? don’t understand. 49 sats on-chain doesn’t look appropriate.
write
preview
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 10h
I think it's been like that from before LN.
Maybe try with a different VPN location?
reply
80 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h
Is not about the IP/VPN use. Is about what they said in that message. Anybody will be willing to pay a small fee, that's not a problem. The problem is why in the hell they said to send 49 sats to an onchain address. that is literally burning sats.
reply
24 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 8h
I've noticed a lot of folks from that era aren't interested in lightning at all.
reply
3 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h
appropriate.
not the right word. It is dumb and misleading.
reply
3 sats \ 1 reply \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 10h
What would be the right word?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h
dumb, idiotic, misleading
reply