pull down to refresh

5 sats \ 6 replies \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 4 May \ parent \ on: bitcointalk.. are you serious?? bitcoin

Are they against LN? don’t understand. 49 sats on-chain doesn’t look appropriate.

write
preview
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 4 May

I think it's been like that from before LN.

Maybe try with a different VPN location?

reply
80 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

Is not about the IP/VPN use. Is about what they said in that message.
Anybody will be willing to pay a small fee, that's not a problem.
The problem is why in the hell they said to send 49 sats to an onchain address. that is literally burning sats.

reply
24 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 May

I've noticed a lot of folks from that era aren't interested in lightning at all.

reply
3 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May
appropriate.

not the right word. It is dumb and misleading.

reply
3 sats \ 1 reply \ @Alice_and_the_Wonderland OP 4 May

What would be the right word?

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 May

dumb, idiotic, misleading

reply