pull down to refresh
33 sats \ 4 replies \ @OT 15h
When would a UTXO set be big enough to cause problems? I keep seeing some data saying that it went from ~4GB in 2022 to ~12GB now.
reply
36 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 14h
Libbitcoin doesn't have a utxo db
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 14h
Hmmm... I knew Eric doesn't like the idea of a mempool.
Is that what makes a faster IBD?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 14h
He basically approaches it on first-principles and doesn't try to copy concepts that Core has.
They have a different architecture that optimizes for (greedy, with 100 outgoing download peers by default) parallel IBD (much less mutex locking, non-serial validation of blocks.)
Last time i tried testing the current development work was when the whole assumeutxo drama went on but it didn't fully validate everything yet back then, so I have to do another run to validate Eric's claims; I'm confident that there's truth to his metrics though. I'm personally interested to see stable operation more than a one-time IBD and find out what the tradeoffs are.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 11h
It's already a problem
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 11h
Code is law
reply