pull down to refresh

id post more, but i dont really make any content, so id just be reposting someone ELSEs content and potentially getting sats for someone else's work. i posted the RHR and just donated 2k sats to them to offset any sats i get.
I wouldn't think of it as getting sats for someone else's work. SN is a link aggregator, so the incentive is to get (relevant) information available in a single place quickly. As content creators start to come on board, they'll naturally be able to post their own content to the site first.
reply
exactly this
reply
i wouldn’t feel bad about stealing credit. As a creator the most difficult thing is getting user eyeballs and attention span. Your real competition is Instagram Youtube Tiktok etc. Links to content are almost always appreciated, especially as creators often feel self conscious about spamming forums such as these.
reply
yes this too, i literally do not post too much of my own stuff for this very reason
reply
This is interesting - you feel like you're kind of receiving credit for their content.
Do you know why you might feel differently sharing someone else's work on Reddit or Twitter (where you get karma/attention)?
reply
i mean we are talking sats here. not some internet points lmao it would be cool if somehow in the future if stacker.news could someone tap into the podcasting 2.0 stuff going on with sphinx and breez and when say marty and matt drop a podcast the site would pick up the rss and post it and any sats garnered from 'upvotes' on the OG post would go straight to them
if you couldnt tell, i dont know shit about coding, dont even know if its possible. but with the post before about the rss feed for stacker.news it got me thinking
reply
idk, can't speak for those guys but i wouldn't care if i had ads in my podcast like them
reply
I get it! Money is sacred.
It sounds like if SN gave you the option to post but send the upvotes/sats to the content creator, you'd feel better about that.
reply
yeah for sure
reply