I think BIP110 is nice, but suspect the temporary nature of it will yield complexities in understanding potential consequences, when paired with things like quantum FUD

something like this?
https://youtu.be/40SnEd1RWUU

It all runs in heavily isolated environments

can you elaborate on this a bit? (please)

I'm interested to improve my adoption of these robots, and i'm fairly technical... but haven't really explored using them more creatively, i.e. outside of my dayjob, or for web application development

Stolen Bitcoin Reserve

(not my joke.. maybe it was @ODELL)

noted

surprised to read all that in Forbes

good article

darth is Spanish?

I use a chiminea

so, synonym is a tether company?

what differentiates this from NOSTR?

Im excited about this development

wonder how it compares with airplanes, in terms of density I bet it's not as high in PPM spacejunk vs 30,000ft

so much cope in those comments

good job getting them to engage, at least

hmm, that's helpful. thanks.

The system isn't buckling, it's being dismantled, and this is a project milestone.

did you write this?

okay... idk, so maybe help enlighten me as to the joke.

I think I get it notionally, but I don't understand what more than "one of us" is meant by "central casting" ??

In 2020, the New York Times reported that in 2016, the year he was elected president, Trump paid $750 in federal income tax and that he had paid no income tax at all in 10 of the prior 15 years after he reported losses that exceeded his earnings.

no mention of taxes paid by the companies he apparently runs

it's important to remember that the only thing that matters are the keys. wallet software gets used to construct keys,

I totally flubbed that explanation, by using wrong word.

s/keys/signatures

if you can't sign, u can't spend. only thing that matters is the signatures

You need to have the descriptor.

that's true. the descriptor points to the private sig, same way it points to the public address

I've never yet used a wallet that let you have multiple spending policies within a single wallet.

yah, because the sig construction follows the same pattern as the address construction.

a typical 2 of 3 multisig wallet has a script that checks to see if at least two of the three listed keys signed the transaction. The keys just show up, they don't express anything about the threshold or even that other keys are required.

just to be a bit more explicit about this... it's not the wallet that has the script. you may have used a piece of software that helped you construct the address in a way you could sign for, but it's the UTXO which contains the rules about whether you can spend it to somebody else.

wallets aren't real, manwallets aren't real, man

when you received the bitcoin into that multisig situation, you computed an address for the sender to direct it to... and then the nodes determined to include a valid transaction in the chain.

in order to spend that UTXO which was sent to you, you must be able to calculate a signature which any node will perceive as being a valid signature to include in a block. and since your multisig software situation will not be available to the validators, the UTXO contains the necessary details for a validator to determine if the signature is valid.

that's not to say there aren't things that seem like walletsthat's not to say there aren't things that seem like wallets

wallets are a useful abstraction, but it's important to remember that the only thing that matters are the keys. wallet software gets used to construct keys, and when We go around talking to people about "wallets" the noobs can get confused about what is going on... that's why it's often such a delightful experience to put your xpub into a new piece of software and be able to 'see your coins' just sitting there. it feels like magic because the abstraction we have taught ourselves doesn't match the reality.

is it called "Little Brother" because it tattles on you about every little thing you do?

don't think I'd ever had SnS before they started offering.

one time I went just because bitcoin, the other time I went just because hungry. both times, a bit of a drive... the second time was motivated by quality.

I'll add... I'm a huge fan of the tallow fries.

as @DarthCoin mentioned tho... not a huge fan of carelessly spending sats where I don't need to. while that's true, I also like to support business I know/appreciate when they're onboard with accepting sats